inferior working conditions are common business practices within private facilities.(3)
While costs appear to be lower, the public ultimately pays for this "savings." Documented escapes of rapists and murderers, rioting, and inmate abuse in prisons run by private companies have jeopardized the safety of communities and increased the bottom-line for taxpayers. Poor performance by a firm operating a prison can be devastating for a community. Underqualified staff and lax management resulted in a bloodbath in one prison in Ohio, and acknowledged but unreported drug use and weapons smuggling by employees within one privately owned facility in Tennessee. When prison management is tied to profit-making, cutting corners results in deadly consequences.(3)
I agree with Ms. Greene on several counts. As the AFSCME report points out, "Conflicts of interest and the rights and well-being of inmates are also at issue. When prisons exist in a quasi-judicial status with an emphasis upon savings and profits, due process may be undermined. A firm may benefit monetarily from extended sentences, and wardens who do not answer to the public may cast a blind eye toward excessive physical force against inmates."(5)
In her critique of the RPPI paper, Greene cited instances of riots, guard corruption, prisoner escapes and murder linked to improper management in private facilities. She also referenced data that indicates that on average there are higher rates of homicide, riots and escapes at private facilities nationwide. Though Greene acknowledged that in some instances privatization has produced lower-cost facilities, she said this often has been achieved at the expense of performance. For example, she referenced a study cited in the RPPI report, but which she believes did not receive a proper examination from Segal and Moore.(5)
The study, released last year by the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics, examined self-reported data from the private prison industry and the U.S. Department of Justice. In it, Justice Department analysts found a 50 percent higher rate of assaults by inmates on staff in private prisons, as well as a 65 percent higher rate of assaults on other inmates.
Greene said these security numbers alone, which are a "key indicator of performance," raise questions about the validity of RPPI's findings of equal or superior performance in private prisons. "I would never argue that our public prison system is free of these problems or anywhere near where it should be performing,"
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
While I do not claim to be an expert on criminal justice, I do see the value of privatization in most areas traditionally
Private for-profit prisons are long overdue and would allow prisoners to actually repay their debt to society. A private
by Jeff Vidrine
Privatized prisons have a checkered history in the United States. The theory is that private, for-profit corporations can
by Ben Hughes
In my humble opinion, with a Masters degree in criminology and criminal justice, prisons should remain part of the state
by Melinda L.
Prisons in general are not the happiest of all places to probably work, or be sitting in because of any crime. Either a
View All Articles on:
Should there be privatized prisons?
Add your voice
Know something about Should there be privatized prisons??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
The Life in the Bible Institute's mission is to educate the general public about the value and importance of reading ...more
hide