There are 9 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #5 by Helium's members.
Before we can accuse religion of being a hindrance to independence, we need to clarify exactly what religion is. I will assume the topic is referring to religion as a believer in God, Supreme Being, Higher Power, Universal Spirit or the like, who practices in a specific denomination with a certain set of doctrine, dogma, tenets or rules that a particular sect believes to be true. If this be the case of the topic's inference, then this assumption is quite prejudiced and "lacking" in understanding. Although, this is one part of the definition of religion, religion is really a bit more generalized. In the Webster's Unabridged Collegiate Dictionary of the English Language it defines religion as "a specific fundamental set of beliefs and practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or sects-OR-something one believes in and follows devotedly". Basically; what this is stating is, whenever anyone believes in something and follows that belief in practice; that which they are practicing is their religion. Therefore; it is not only believers who are "religious" but atheists, who believe in no God, practice that non-belief and this non-belief is their religion and agnostics; who claim God cannot be known, practice this belief and this is their religion. I have been told by many an atheist that I am playing with word semantics. I beg to differ. Is it not those who are changing the definition in the dictionary to suit their own ego, guilty of confabulations to justify their own opinions? After all, I know of no atheist who would honestly admit to being "religious", do you? But; according to the definition in one of the leading internationally accepted dictionaries, "Webster's", it states what it states. Would a come back from an atheist defending his "non-religious" religion be a kind of apologetics of the opposite side? After all, when a believer gives an explanation of the bible the atheist does not agree with, they call the believer an apologetic. HA! HA! HA! We humans are sure nuff hypocrites; ain't we?
This topic is really one of psychology. Since religion has to do with belief and belief is fundamentally centered in the mind; being defined as "mental acceptance of and conviction in the truth, actuality, or validity of something." It has been said: "the mind is a terrible thing to waste", but; waste it, we humans will do. Believe it or not; true independence comes from the detachment of all beliefs, in the mind. We put so much emphasis on education these days
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Independence and the hindrance of religion
Religion sets boundaries. It sets boundaries for how we live in a secular world,
by J Robbins
Commentary: Does Religion Hinder Independent Thinking?
Close your eyes after reading this paragraph. Keep them closed and
by V. Kumar
"Man was born free, and everywhere he is in chains," these words of Jean-Jacques Rousseau were not used to refer to the impact
by John Sarkis
Using the USA as an example: Washington did right to make the then infamous church of England stayed out of the US affairs,
by Rhonda Coyle
Before we can accuse religion of being a hindrance to independence, we need to clarify exactly what religion is. I will assume
View All Articles on:
Commentary: Independence and the hindrance of religion
Add your voice
Know something about Commentary: Independence and the hindrance of religion ?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Featured Partner
Enclave is a church in Turlock, California that is exploring what it means to follow Jesus in a rapidly changing cult...more
hide