Definitely fewer people should receive Social Security Disability (SSD) benefits. In a perfect world, no one would even need it. But this is the real world.
The original intent of Social Security was to provide a basic support system for people who had labored all their lives to support themselves and their families and paid into the national tax system.
If you lived long enough you would get your money back. It was basically a mandatory savings plan paid for by the workers and administered by the government.
One day someone asked what would happen if you were seriously injured on the job and were unable to work. Why should you have to live in poverty while your Social Security money sat in the government coffers waiting to see if you lived long enough to collect it? These are the sorts of things that prompted the establishment of SSD.
However, like any other government program it was born with the potential for fraud, abuse and waste. Not one of our elected officials thought to close the loopholes or, if they did, they failed to follow up.
Their carelessness or negligence ends up costing us all in the long run. One thing we know is if there is a way to exploit a system someone will find it. And if no one deals with them, more people will follow.
Events happen that prevent some people from ever being able to support themselves and their children. Accidents that cripple; diseases or genetic disorders that limit physical or mental development.
That has happened with SSD. I personally know a number of people who are collecting large monthly checks from SSD without actually working for it. One man I know had a rough childhood for certain. He never grew up into a confident, self-sufficient man.
Now he's in his mid-thirties, has never worked, has never pursued an education or skill. All he does is sit, eat and play video games. He doesn't need to work because he gets a big check every month; a check drawn from our savings. Several hundred pounds overweight, he sees no reason to change his lifestyle.
That's the problem with the way SSD is administered today. The money is given to the recipients without any effort made to try to restore the person.
The man I mentioned today could have benefitted from a few years of serious psychological treatment; perhaps in-house care. It would have been expensive but it still would be less than the cost of lifelong care.
The system needs to be changed to a restorative program. Instead of measuring success by the amount of money being doled out, they should make it their goal to minimize the number of non-working recipients.
Not everyone wants to go to work. It's easier to have it just handed to you. But those people can be weeded out, forced to work or left to their own devices.
Others can be retrained to do job unrelated to their previous experience and unaffected by their present state.
Those who remain will be those who truly need to be supported. As a working member of society I have no problem taking care of the weak and infirm. I have a problem with carrying the lazy.
America's working class deserves to be cared for by their government as well. It is they who do the work, make the products and keep the economy rolling. They have earned the money feeding the Social Security coffers.
They deserve to have the fruits of their labor protected for their future not squandered by the lazy and undeserving - in the community and on Capitol Hill.