by Xavier Grey

Created on: July 12, 2008   Last Updated: July 15, 2008

In a democratic society the majority prevails. If the majority happens to be represented effectively by a religious organization, religion prevails. Democracy is comprised of representatives, who by definition are obligated to pursue the interests of their constituents; or they will subsequently find themselves with a very short political career.

Congregations allow for the agendas of their faith to be promoted, in neighborhoods, communities, and so on. Where religion fails is in regard to the congregation member's individual inability to maintain the morals and virtues outlined by their respective faith; and much the same can be said about religious leaders. This does nothing to impact the extent to which they will promote their faith; even if they are personally incapable of living up to the very standards they would impose on the rest of society.

Religious leaders are representative of people also, often elected in some sense of the term, though some are obviously appointed, much like political institutions. Religions function in much the same way as political organizations, in that they are all too willing to define, promote, and enforce "laws" upon those in positions to be effected, seemingly without feeling personally obligated to abide by them, or even consider them behind closed doors.

Religious leaders apply pressure to politicians; they lobby on behalf of the perceived moral right; and are sometimes successful in having their agendas supported. Ultimately however, it is the individual members of the congregation who support the leadership, who pressure politicians, that are in positions which allow them to advocate for a given policy, or practice that are responsible for any power that their religious leaders wield.

If the individuals who comprise the religious congregation do not truly support the agenda's being promoted, they should not contribute; even if it's only by way of being passive. This counter pressure should be applied in a way that encompasses all sects, and all congregations. If religious leaders do not truly believe in a matter, they should not promote it; even if it alienates a portion of their flock. God doesn't need advocates who don't truly believe in his cause; which by Christian standards should reflect tolerance and love. If politicians do not truly support a cause, they should not allow themselves to be pressured into taking action; they should not compromise their personal integrity for the sake of a church, a pastor, or even

• 1
• 2
• Next Page >>