1 of 23

Write now Article Tools

Page 4 of 5

and cuddly just us political posture and the oil tough guy politics recently put out by neo-cons on Iraq. Neither extreme has much validity as each are dysfunctional responses to real world political facts. Interestingly in politics the wrong answers sometimes don't matter when enacted by powers able to afford them perhaps analogous to macro-economic incompetence producing deficit spending or weakened national prosperity while not having a federal deficit.

The real world exists and attitudes of the prosperous to it in a world of a majority of poor people should be that of authorized leaders in environmental conservation, environmental technology, national security and democratic nationalism working within a world with comparative trade advantage paradigms even while enterprisers to direct international trade for-themselves. If a passive, feminine political voice is given such that a daydreaming Utopian delusion is enacted then the world definitely will take away one's prosperity and security. If a hard, cruel militarism is an ordinary policy with deficit spending and a neglecting of margarine and coffee for the masses then another avenue of national self-destruction is actualized. Yet the common rottenness of the rich in international relations since the beginning of the 20th century advances politics globally into the realm of the insensate and stupid automatic policy blunders leading to war even as talk of peace and moderation is given. It is not enough to simply posture as head of a large ineffective organization may do for pr purposes when right corrective action is needed to end the conditions building up to large scale civil disasters on an international scale such as can be found in certain forms of war such as the great wars of the 20th century. Chamberlainian ostrich policies aren't effective ways to execute responses to international dangers of a real nature, and neither is the security of the rich in their warm blankets and air-conditioned comforts able to osmosis over to cool down international terrorism and belligerency generally.

Admiral Mullins recently has been talking about his incapability of comprehending how the United States could deal with a conflict with Iran because the troops would be over stressed. It is good that he quit or was relieved from command at this time. A right thinking military commander should like Julius Caesar be seeking an intelligent way to solve the dilemma fortuitously such as at Alexandria or in Trans-Alpine Gaul.

• << previous page
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
• next page >>

Add your voice

Know something about Is Iran's nuclear threat of any concern to us??
We want to hear your view. Write now!