There are 77 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #1 by Helium's members.
"My friend," said my daughter, "is voting for the chick. I'm voting for the Negro. Who are you voting for?"
"What about the good ole boy?" I asked.
According to identity politics, my daughter had a choice between the woman, Hillary Clinton, and the man, Barack Obama, who, like her, was biracial. The Southerner, John Edwards, would have been the logical choice for me. Now that the Republicans have decided on John McCain, I should go for the old white guy. Fortunately we have gone beyond the stereotypes of identity politics. We voted as a family for Barack Obama in the California primary and hope to do so again in the general election.
Will Americans vote for a black man or white woman? Now that there has been a particular black man and white woman running for president, the answer keeps changing. According to the Roper poll, in 2007, 94% of voters said if their party nominated a black man they would vote for him, up from 37% in 1958. 86% said they would vote for a white woman, up from 54% in 1958 but down from 90% in 1997/98. I am not surprised by the upswing; as an optimist, I believe in moral progress as well as technological progress. I am a little surprised at the apparent increase in sexism from 1998 to 2007, possibly because of the prospect of a particular woman candidate. However, I think we have reached the point that more people want to vote for a woman or a black man that want to vote against her or him. The dilemma is that in the Democratic party we could only vote for one by voting against the other.
I am not inclined to attribute the decisions of voters to bigotry. My first assumption is that people vote for their own perceived self-interest. It is well known that certain demographic groups support certain candidates. Obama has captured ninety per cent of the black vote. Clinton did better among white voters. Exit polls in the Kentucky primary show that 21% of voters said the candidate's race was important to them. Of whites who said race was important, 88% voted for Clinton and 9% for Obama. Of those who said race was not important, 68% voted for Clinton and 28% voted for Obama. It appears that racism was a factor in the Kentucky primary but it was not the only reason for Clinton's victory.
Sexism may have even worked in Hilary's favor. Of the 16% of voters who said gender was important to them, 79% voted for Hilary. This does not mean discrimination against women in politics is a thing of the past. I interpret it to mean that the bias against women
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
"My friend," said my daughter, "is voting for the chick. I'm voting for the Negro. Who are you voting for?"
"What about the
by Tom Magill
The question is not "will Americans vote..." but "Which Americans will vote...". Firstly, who will vote for a black man?
by Y Tian
Having taken a quick glance through the other articles, it worries me slightly that most of them seem to have taken this
Sometimes, the so-called miracles happen and there's nothing, in the reality, that makes it impossible or wrong the American
Content of character and aptitude are important criteria for a Presidential candidate, race and gender are not. What matters
View All Articles on:
Will Americans vote for a black man or white woman?
Add your voice
Know something about Will Americans vote for a black man or white woman??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
A Day of Hope has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse A Day of Hope's fea...more
hide