step that the legislature has provided may be taken only when the circumstances indicate a danger to the physical health and welfare of the children, and the need for protection of the children is so urgent that immediate removal of the children from the home is necessary."
The court talks about the following facts that were undisputed by the Department of Child Protective Services. The only danger to the male children or the female children who had not reached puberty identified by the Department was the Department's assertion that the "pervasive belief system" of the FLDS community groomed the males to be perpetrators of sexual abuse later in life and taught the girls to submit to sexual abuse after reaching puberty. There was no evidence that the male children, or the female children who had not reached puberty, were victims of sexual or other physical abuse or in danger of being victims of sexual or other physical abuse. Also, there was no evidence that any of the female children other than the five identified as having become pregnant between the ages of fifteen and seventeen were victims or potential victims of sexual or other physical abuse. Additionally, the Department conceded at the hearing that teenage pregnancy, by itself, is not a reason to remove children from their home and parents, but took the position that immediate removal was necessary in this case because "there is a mind-set that even the young girls report that they will marry at whatever age, and that it's the highest blessing they can have to have children."
It may sound outrageous when you hear about girls are married by guys who are old enough to be their dad. But keep in mind, a horror story alone is not a legal basis for removing hundreds of children form their parents. The Texas Court of appeals, Third District, at Austin is clearly right in pointing out that a good intention would not substitute legal procedures for proving that a child is in imminent danger.
http://www.3rdcoa.court s.state.tx.us/opinions/htmlopi nion.asp?OpinionId=16865
Learn more about this author, Domestic Avalanche.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
As any thinking American could have predicted, the Texas Supreme Court has ruled that the actions of Child Protective Services
Assault on the First Amendment rights of Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints in Texas
Here is another
by E. Manning
You don't have to be a polygamist advocate to shiver at the ongoing battle for public sympathy that is taking place in Texas.
by Sarah Lewis
This is a very dangerous precedent-setting case and America must wake up and look at what it could mean for everyone-all
Polygamist families are reuniting since the Texas Supreme Court has overruled the Department of Child Protective Service's(CPS)
View All Articles on:
Commentary: Children of the polygamous Texas FLDS sect
Add your voice
Know something about Commentary: Children of the polygamous Texas FLDS sect?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
OpentheGovernment.org (OTG) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse Openth...more
hide