taught as mythology. The study of Intelligent Design could be taught as "Flash, and it was there!" and it would be the shortest and most hollow of all courses, but with great reading from the origins of fiction. Of course, many religious folks would be offended at their views of their universe being cast aside as mythology, but so too are the scientists who devote their lives to their work which is then mangled and fed to our children as being false simply because some of us don't want to believe in the facts of science.
John Freshwater was being paid with our tax dollars to teach our children the updated information coming from our community of scientists and researchers. He was not being paid to teach "the values of the parents in the Mount Vernon school district". Classes in values are being taught at the local church, mosque, synagogue, and temple - or better yet, values are taught at home. And it is most important to note that in the case of Evangelical Christians there are quite a few values' that are being completely overlooked. Two of which are Honesty and Integrity.
There is no honesty behind teaching children that the Earth is 10,000 years old, that carbon dating is inaccurate, and the factual information coming from evolutionists is false. And there certainly is no integrity behind stealing the information and tagging it with "God was here." The more evolutionists learn by way of testing the more Christians steal by way of fear and prejudice. They take all that is given and sum it up with two words - intelligent design, and sadly enough, they're the only side in the battle who feel the need to place finality on the beliefs of our origins. Evolutionists aren't telling the public that there isn't a god as much they are telling us what their observations and experiments prove. If their findings further negate the presence of a god then it should only be seen as a byproduct of the hypothesis as opposed to it being the intentions behind the experiment. Evolutionists aren't looking to disprove gods, but only to discover where everything ultimately came from.
Babu Ranganathan, a Christian writer from Bob Jones University, is one of the people so angry at the hypotheses of scientific experimentation that he's gone to war against reality and factual information, only to retain the selfish belief that his god can be the only answer. He took the belief that life on Mars might've originated there after being blasted into outer space from Earth being impacted by
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Is Intelligent Design Science or Religion?
(Dissectin g Intelligent Design)
Author and biochemist Isaac Asimov once wrote,
by Heather Lyon
As a biologist and a biology teacher, I don't think Intelligent design can be considered a science. It simply cannot be
by Anna Charny
Is it possible that some unknown intelligence is behind the mechanics of our universe? Yes, it is. Is it scientific theory?
by Ray Burke
The flaws of ID:
Thank you ID. Once again, a pseudoscience has shown itself up to be a lame duck because of its innate flaws.
by David Shane
To decide whether or not intelligent design can be considered a science, two rather bigger questions must be answered. Namely
View All Articles on:
Can intelligent design be considered a science
Add your voice
Know something about Can intelligent design be considered a science?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
LEAP has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse LEAP's featured titles, pick ...more
hide