There are 29 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #14 by Helium's members.
Stealing Science
John Freshwater's heinous act of branding a cross on the arm of his middle-school student in Mount Vernon, Ohio should not be very shocking to us. Though it brought much media attention, as "shock stories" tend to do, the thought of an uncompassionate Christian willfully harming others seems to be all too common these days. From the child molestation problems in the Catholic church, to the war in Iraq - brought to you by the likes of the Christian Coalition, Focus on the Family, and all of those "holier than thou" that continue supporting the slaughtering of innocent civilians by voting for their favorite Republican war-monger. Those who consider themselves "compassionate Christians" are often the most violent offenders of human rights. They enact laws against the freedom to choose how we want to live, and die. They uphold the law that forces a person to suffer a tortuous death until their affliction consumes them, without having the option of shutting off the device and being left to die in peace. With that said, we can take the news of John Freshwater as just another drop in the bucket. Although, from the very same occurrance in Mount Vernon, Ohio, we were given the gift of insight to the true intentions of those who fear science - those who simply write off our entire universe as an "intelligent design".
It was during the heat of the Mount Vernon moment; when the vans congregated and the reporters and their crews raced like rats to the cheese. The cheese they came across was the friend of the 'science teacher', Dave Daubenmire. Daubenmire was intelligent enough to understand that it was wrong for Freshwater to burn a cross on to his student's arm. But he muttered his support for the other heinous act Freshwater was committing - teaching his science class that the Judeo-Christian God is the reason for our universe, and that science cannot be trusted. Daubenmire told us all what ID supporters have been trying to tell us all along, "I believe John Freshwater is teaching the values of the parents in the Mount Vernon school district." In fact, Freshwater was doing just that - using his job as a science teacher to teach against science.
The reason so many citizens, religious and non-religious, are up in arms against teaching Intelligent Design in the science classes of our public schools is due to the fact that there is no science in the belief of gods. The study of omnipotent beings would fall under the social studies category where it is already
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Is Intelligent Design Science or Religion?
(Dissectin g Intelligent Design)
Author and biochemist Isaac Asimov once wrote, "The
by Heather Lyon
As a biologist and a biology teacher, I don't think Intelligent design can be considered a science. It simply cannot be subjected
by Anna Charny
Is it possible that some unknown intelligence is behind the mechanics of our universe? Yes, it is. Is it scientific theory?
by Ray Burke
The flaws of ID:
Thank you ID. Once again, a pseudoscience has shown itself up to be a lame duck because of its innate flaws.
by David Shane
To decide whether or not intelligent design can be considered a science, two rather bigger questions must be answered. Namely
View All Articles on:
Can intelligent design be considered a science
Add your voice
Know something about Can intelligent design be considered a science?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
International Campaign for Tibet (ICT)
International Campaign for Tibet (ICT) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Br...more
hide