Home > Politics, News & Issues > Politics, News & Issues (Other)
Results so far:
| Yes | 46% | 111 votes | Total: 243 votes | |
| No | 54% | 132 votes |
Created on: June 25, 2008
The only thing preventing a nuclear attack at this point is the realization that Americans will retaliate with substantial force. Think in terms of our response after 9/11. Trillions spent for military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, a new executive department dedicated to hunting down 'potential' terrorists and protecting airports and other public venues, and finally the willingness of people to accept invasions of privacy and reductions in personal liberty (Patriot Act) in a nation that whines when they must wait in line at the DMV.
Even the most avowed America hater must admit to some hesitation to use a nuclear weapon when they realize its going to provide ardent war hawks with concrete justification for even greater military adventures, tighter security, and stripping of liberty to promote public safety. Bush has been blasted because a 'smoking gun' of WMD was not found in Iraq. So, does anyone think a dirty nuke lit off in New York's Grand Central or Chicago's Union Station will help or hurt chances for thoughtful action?
With this said one may think, "Okay smart guy, you said yes to this question so why explanations as to why it will not happen?" Time and the attention span of people who don't like to wait in line at Starbucks, flip through 500 channels seeking something that will capture attention for about 15 minutes at a stretch, and a media establishment that decides every 11 days that a new crisis looms on our horizon (promptly forgetting the host of other unsolved disasters).
In addition to American and world ADD when it comes to issues and dangers there is the problem of just how prolific both the Allies and Communist were in producing the tools to make large, medium, and small scale nuclear weapons. Just take the Savannah River facility and think about the thousands of plugs of plutonium produced from the 50s to the 90s. We used a few in above and under ground testing but that still leaves lots of very radioactive basic components lying around. Storage and disposal is a continued concern in that we must take precautions to transport and safely store these building blocks for a nuclear weapons. Do you think those charged with security and monitoring are above economics or politics? The 'enemy' spent a tidy sum moving people, weapons, and planning for not one but two attacks on the World Trade Center. Money spent could have already bought components for building a suit case size dirty bomb.
Now think about the fall of the Soviet Union. Talk about
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Is the US destined for nuclear attack?
Yes
No
View all articles on: Is the US destined for nuclear attack?