Home > Politics, News & Issues > Politics, News & Issues (Other)
Created on: June 24, 2008 Last Updated: June 26, 2008
Sure, let's get a flat tax. That will just hurt the folks at the bottom more than it would those towards the top.
2007 Tax tables from the horse's mouth
Basic assumption for this analysis:
- Basic standard deductions used, no mortgage interest write-off, etc. Married individuals.
- Flat tax of 15% after first $15,000 because there has to be some level of poverty that shouldn't be taxed, right?
Progressive Tax method:
Median income approximately $45,000/yr.
Taxes paid: $3,856 (based on taxable income of $30,900)
Flat tax method:
Median income approximately $45,000/yr.
Taxes paid: $4,500 (based on taxable income of $30,000)
Now, here's another scenario. The only change is that household income is twice the median household income.
Assumption: Income for both scenarios is $90,000
Progressive Tax method:
Taxes paid: $11,829 (based on taxable income of $75,900)
Flat tax method:
Taxes paid: $11,250 (based on taxable income of $75,000)
Now, here's a final scenario. The only change is that household income is 6 times the median household income.
Assumption: Income for both scenarios is $270,000
Progressive Tax method:
Taxes paid: $57,576 (based on taxable income of $237,500)
Flat tax method:
Taxes paid: $38,250 (based on taxable income of $255,000)
Now, for in-depth examination of the flat tax scenarios above:
The folks that made double the median household income were able to keep $579 in comparison to what they pay now.
But the married folks that made closer to the median household income were lucky enough to PAY an additional $644 MORE due to the flat tax.
However most "amazing" is that at the higher income rates, you'll notice that they actually pay less tax than they would currently. Heck, the single folks in this tax bracket would get to keep an extra $29,081! But the married folks would only get to keep and an extra $19,326 of their hard earned money!
Now, I don't know about you, but I'd be all for the flat tax, if I were making more than the median household income.
After all, I'd get to keep A LOT more of what I made, in comparison to the folks at the bottom who would get to pay MORE!
Now, of course if we allow deductions, that changes the entire scenario, whether it is a flat tax or the current progressive tax!
And even the folks that earn money at the lower end of the spectrum can take advantage of the deductions using the current progressive tax system.
Learn more about this author, Chris Conn.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Why a US flat tax is a good idea
by Dolf
The federal income tax was enacted in 1913. Tax rates ranged from 1% to 7% (7% was on incomes over $500,000). In 1913, less
by John Cane
There are two primary arguments for a flat tax, simplification and removing the disincentives for productivity. There are
Poor self-employed contractors allready pay 10% tax even on income under the standard deduction. Form S.E. is a basic 10%
by Chris Conn
Sure, let's get a flat tax. That will just hurt the folks at the bottom more than it would those towards the top.
2007 Tax
by Matthew Ryan
For a long time (roughly twenty years now) I've been a supporter of the Flat Tax here in the United States. I've always
View All Articles on: Why a US flat tax is a good idea
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Is the Fairness Doctrine a muzzle to silence conservatives?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment (FREE)
FREE advances conservation and environmental values by applying modern science and America's founding ideals to policy debates. FREE is comprised of intellectual entrepreneurs explaining how economic incentives, secure property rights, t...more