1 of 3

No

Write now Article Tools

Having been an underwriter in the insurance industry for over thirty years, I've found more carriers rely on information from credit history as a method of determining acceptability of a client or the premium charged. I disagree vehemently. In my experience, when an application crossed my desk, even the perfect client can lose money for the carrier, with or without a favorable credit report.

While actuaries employed by the companies can quote statistics and studies, profitability is still a roll of the dice. Insurance is based on the law of large numbers. Basically, in layman's terms, the law of large numbers means that the more people you are insuring, the easier it is to predict losses within certain parameters. If you use this basis, then credit reports have absolutely nothing to do with the law of large numbers. It's simply Insurance 101 and credit reports are not viable if the law of large numbers remains a sound practice. I've found that actuaries take out the human equation, meaning they deal strictly with the numbers and those numbers are based on the inevitable law of large numbers.

Let's visit the credit report topic and try to give the actuaries some defense. First of all, there are only a few major credit reporting agencies in the United States. All contain virtually the same data. How reliable are they? Usually, the reports are mostly sound, given recent history. However, how many clients have had to fight to remove strange or incorrect entries? Is there any recourse for an individual denied insurance based solely on an incorrect credit report? The Fair Credit Reporting Act says there is, but in the case of insurance, probably not. By the time an individual receives notice that they were denied insurance based on a negative report, they've usually moved on to find another market for insurance. I can honestly say that if a prospective insured advised their retail agent that the credit report was wrong, as an underwriter, the first words out of my mouth would be tactfully worded but basically, "Prove it." Meanwhile, the prospective insured dukes it out with the credit reporting agency which could take months. In the case of auto insurance, they, like most, need it yesterday. They simply tell their retail agent to find another market, that won't go to a credit reporting agency. These alternative markets that don't utilize credit reports could result in higher premiums. They pay the price and the originating company never hears from

• 1
• 2
• next page >>

Add your voice

Know something about Should insurance companies be required to inform customers their premium is affected by their credit score??
We want to hear your view. Write now!