Home > Politics, News & Issues > Pulitzer Center
Title endorsed in part by:
Created on: May 25, 2008
The US should play a dominant role in reducing the production of drugs throughout the world. The fact is that drugs are a huge threat to the public welfare, and any good parent aspires to keep their children away from drugs. The debate ensues when one attempts to define just exactly how that is to be accomplished. The only logical way to reduce the production of drugs is to take away the incentives that propel a person to produce them, or to sell, or for that matter, to use them.
Let's start from the bottom of the totem pole. People use drugs because they are exposed to them and they are readily available. Drugs are readily available for purchase because there are huge profits in selling them because drugs are illegal. Drug dealers are able to get their hands on the product for the same reason that users are, it is available to them. It is available to them because it is being produced, whether locally or abroad is of no consequence. People are producing drugs because there are huge profits in the aspects of production. Again, this is because it is illegal.
The question is then posed: How does the fact that drugs are illegal make them worth more? Well, the explanation is simple. If something is illegal, then there are risks associated with trafficking the substance, it also makes the substance rarer. These two things in themselves raise the value of any given substance which is subjected to sanctions, or can be criminally prosecuted. The buyer has to pay for the supply and demand aspect of the product, as well as the potential risk to those who manufacture or sell the product.
In turn, high profit margins attract the criminal element. An element that is not subject to any sort of licensing procedures or profit documentations. This creates a no holds barred business structure which is ran by criminal enterprises. Such enterprises have no rules, and do not pay taxes on the profits they make. For these reasons drugs have come to be a plague to the civilized world, associated with other evils such as, prostitution, murder, money laundering, extortion, and corruption. Also the United States government looses out on billions of dollars in taxes in an undocumented, underground market that is ran by unscrupulous criminals.
In this light, the answer then is not criminalization, but regulation and education. By legalizing drugs you accomplish several objectives. You narrow the profit margin associated with the the production or sales of drugs. Suddenly the amount of
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
What role should the US play in reducing the production of illicit drugs-such as cocaine and heroin-in places like Bolivia and Afghanistan?
The United States has every right to enforce it’s own illicit drug laws, to continue with their war on drugs, as long
by Joseph Malek
For many years tons of cocaine has been coming into the United States of America each and every year since someone invented
by Eric Lannak
Most drug-crops are raised by impoverished farmers who see no other way to improve their lives. In Bolivia and Afghanistan,
The only way to reduce the production of illicit drugs is to reduce the potential huge profits from manufacturing and selling
by Dave Gibson
In 2000, the Taliban banned opium production in Afghanistan, as it became illegal to grow poppies. Any farmer caught cultivating
View All Articles on: What role should the US play in reducing the production of illicit drugs-such as cocaine and heroin-in places like Bolivia and Afghanistan?
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Is poverty the main factor in crime within the US?
Click for your side.