Home > Politics, News & Issues > Political & Economic Theory
Created on: May 24, 2008
Stop thinking of anarchism as just another "world order," just another social system. From where we all stand, in this very dominated, very controlled world, it is impossible to imagine living without any authorities, without laws or governments. No wonder anarchism isn't usually taken seriously as a large-scale political or social program: no one can imagine what it would really be like, let alone how to achieve it-not even the anarchists themselves.
Instead, think of anarchism as an individual orientation to yourself and others, as a personal orientation to yourself and others, as a personal approach to life. That's not impossible to imagine. Conceived in these terms, what would anarchism be? It would be a decision to think for yourself rather than following blindly. It would be a rejection of hierarchy, a refusal to accept the "god given" authority of any nation, law, or other force as being more significant than your own authority over yourself. It would be an instinctive distrust of those who claim to have some sort of rank or status above others around them, and an unwillingness to claim such status over others for yourself. most of all, it would be a refusal to place responsibility for yourself in the hands of others: it would be the demand that each of us not only be able to choose our own destiny, but also do so.
According to this definition, there are a great deal more anarchists than it seemed, though most wouldn't refer to themselves as such. For most people, when they think about it, want to have the right to live their own lives, to think and act as they see fit. Most people trust themselves to figure out what they should do more than they trust any authority to dictate to them. Almost everyone is frustrated when they find themselves pushing against faceless, impersonal power.
You don't want to be at the mercy of governments, bureaucracies, police, or other outside forces, do you? Surely you don't let them dictate your entire life. Don't you do what you want to, what you believe in, at least whenever you can get away with it? In our everyday lives, we all are anarchists. Whenever we make decisions for ourselves, whenever we take responsibility for our own actions rather than deferring to some higher power, we are putting anarchism into practice.
So if we are all anarchists by nature, why do we always end up accepting the domination of others, even creating forces to rule over us? Wouldn't you rather figure out how to coexist with your fellow
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The option of anarchy
The Reality of Egalitarianism in Human History
Introduction :
Before beginning a discussion of anarchy as a political option
In an ideal world, in which humankind acted with kindness and respect toward each other, and without attempting to dominate
by Lauren Vork
The Option of Anarchy (And How To Tell Your Mother You've Taken It)
The label "anarchist" has a lot of unfortunate, inaccurate
Humanity has made a lot of bad choices throughout history, especially recent history, however, none would surpass in utter
Civil Disobedience: The Right of Revolution
Henry David Thoreau's essay "On the Duty of Civil Disobedience" written in 1849
View All Articles on: The option of anarchy
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Crime: Individual responsibility or social problems?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Nature's Voice Our Choice's mission is to preserve, conserve, and restore water resources in communities throughout the world through public awareness, education, and the implementation of projects that use applied science and traditiona...more