There are 6 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #6 by Helium's members.
I just bought the June Vanity Fair issue that features the "controversial" photographs of Miley Cyrus. I didn't buy it for that reason, I bought the magazine because of the cover and the article about Robert F. Kennedy. The fact that he is the cover story has been largely overshadowed by this latest "scandal".
I saw the photographs of Miley Cyrus in the magazine.
Actually, I was surprised that there are only the two; two that I have seen published everywhere else. They are not that shocking to me. I don't feel that they portend the end of civilization as we know it. They are quite attractive photographs; Annie Leibovitz is an amazing photographer. It might not have been the best decision for her and her parents to make but it has been made.
This whole controversy reminds me of when I was a teenager in the 1970s and David Cassidy posed nude for Rolling Stone magazine; coincidentally, those photographs were also taken by Annie Leibovitz. The two nude photographs were tastefully cropped. There were the same cries from concerned parents and the media back then. Cassidy was in his 20's at the time and an adult, but many of his fans were as young as eight-years-old. In the long run, I don't think it damaged his career. I don't think it corrupted me beyond repair after I saw the photographs and read the article.
Is Miley Cyrus giving the right image to the youth of today in this photo spread? Maybe not.
Are the photographs too "adult"? Maybe. But, as a reporter said in a column I read in my local newspaper, at least she doesn't dress like a "skank" who is putting it all out there for all to see, like so many other young girls and 'tweens and those they look up to do.
What bothers me about this whole controversy is that people are willing to bypass their own parental responsibilities onto the teenage star of a television show. It is up to the parents to make sure their child is influenced in a positive way by them. Parents must teach their children that what you see on television is not real. Miley Cyrus is playing a character named Hannah Montana. If a child is raised with love and is taught to be confident in their own skin, they should not have to look towards a celebrity to learn how to act or how to feel. It is also up to parents to try and make sure that their children are not overly influenced by peer pressure. Saying they can't do anything about it is a cop-out, in my opinion.
Learn more about this author, Susan Keeping.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
It can be expected that a fifteen year old would make mistakes - take for instance the Flava-Flav sized peace sign I ... read more
At the beginning of her career, Miley Cyrus seemed to be the best role model for young girls. It seemed like kids wou... read more
by Adela Velic
Is she really giving the right image? No and yes. She is 17, and doing what all other girls are doing at her age. We ... read more
by Noemi Csifo
Can I say that Miley Cyrus' behavior is appropiate for her age? No, I can't because that kind of behavior isn't appro... read more
by izzy
Every afternoon my granddaughters come in from school and plop down to watch Miley Cyrus' make believe life as Hannah... read more
View All Articles on:
Is Miley Cyrus giving the right image to youth of today?
Add your voice
Know something about Is Miley Cyrus giving the right image to youth of today??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Already a member? Log in.
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
The Center for Responsive Politics (Open Secrets)
The Center for Responsive Politics (CRP) is the nation's premier research group tracking money in US politics and its...more
hide