Home > Politics, News & Issues > Pulitzer Center
Title endorsed in part by:
Created on: May 17, 2008 Last Updated: May 14, 2009
The only way to reduce the production of illicit drugs is to reduce the potential huge profits from manufacturing and selling it. Is there a realistic way to do this without addressing the drug problem in the United States and Europe? In the debate for solutions, some favor using militaristic means to subdue production and criminalizing their use. Another side argues treating drug addiction and its underlying causes and then educating the public about the dangers inherent in using these substances.
It should be understood at the outset of any serious and honest discussion about drug trafficking, that a huge infrastructure and bureaucracy has been created by different countries and U.S. administrations seeking to deal with the drug problem from the supply side. There are entirely too many individuals, agencies and businesses that have a vested interest in protecting their own turf and jobs. There is a great deal of money invested in the "Drug War." They really can't be relied on to make sound policy decisions on what works.
The International Narcotics Control Board (INCB) is an independent and quasi-judicial monitoring body for the implementation of the United Nations international drug control conventions. In their annual report issued in March of this year, the President, Dr. Philip O. Emafo argues that those who seek to legalize drugs are ignoring historical facts.
"The first international controls over narcotic drugs introduced in 1912 helped to reduce the scourge of opium addiction in some Asian countries. Some sixty years later, accession to the 1971 Convention on Psychotropic Substances contributed to a significant decline in the abuse of these substances, which presented serious health problems in the 1950s and 1960s. Given these and other experiences, suggestions to legalize the use of illicit drugs appear rather simplistic and misplaced."
Yet the use of legal and illegal narcotic drugs has not been reduced in the United States despite decades long "War on Drugs." According FBI reports, every 17 seconds someone is arrested in the United States for a drug related offense. There is no evidence that the 1930's prohibition against alcohol had any downward effect on its production or its use. In fact, there is evidence that it was responsible for increased crime. The price of incarcerating thousands of citizens every year for possessing illegal drugs sometimes for many years is not only too high in dollars but is too high in the costs to families.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
What role should the US play in reducing the production of illicit drugs-such as cocaine and heroin-in places like Bolivia and Afghanistan?
The United States has every right to enforce it’s own illicit drug laws, to continue with their war on drugs, as long
by Joseph Malek
For many years tons of cocaine has been coming into the United States of America each and every year since someone invented
by Eric Lannak
Most drug-crops are raised by impoverished farmers who see no other way to improve their lives. In Bolivia and Afghanistan,
by Dave Gibson
In 2000, the Taliban banned opium production in Afghanistan, as it became illegal to grow poppies. Any farmer caught cultivating
The only way to reduce the production of illicit drugs is to reduce the potential huge profits from manufacturing and selling
View All Articles on: What role should the US play in reducing the production of illicit drugs-such as cocaine and heroin-in places like Bolivia and Afghanistan?
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Population Services International
PSI is a leading global health organization with programs targeting malaria, child survival, HIV and reproductive health. Working in partnership within the public and private sectors, and harnessing the power of markets, PSI provides lif...more