There are 44 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #12 by Helium's members.
The Effective Alternative: Why Drugs Should be Legalized
In hopes of reducing society's drug use, western governments have put immense effort towards the war on drugs'. Unfortunately, this immense effort has shown discouraging results. Even Jane Crist of the White House Office of National Drug Policy admits, "there has been no direct effect on either the price or the availability of [illegal drugs]" (Boaz). There must be an alternative to the failing and costly prohibition. That alternative is the legalization of drugs. Drug legalization would benefit Britain by boosting the economy; regulating drug culture by increasing safety and decreasing violence; and by alleviating the moral restraints imposed by the government, therefore upholding liberal rights of British citizens.
Britain's economy would benefit from taking control of the drug market through legalization. Currently, governments are spending billions to stop drug use (Becker). This attempt is futile, as we are simply seeing more arrests instead of less drug activity. In 1996, 59.6% of federal prisoners in the United States were imprisoned on drug related charges (Boaz). These prisoners are costing massive sums for less than massive crimes. Should drugs be legalized, billions could be saved annually, solely because governments would no longer be spending useless dollars to keep drug offenders in jail.
Legalization would not only save money, but would also boost the economy through taxation. The war on drugs' has created more risk in drug dealing, which makes drug prices swell (Becker). The government assumes that these price increases will generate a decrease in consumption. Unfortunately, addicted users find drugs to be a necessity, not a luxury, and economically, all necessities will be consumed despite any increase in price. In casual users, a 10% increase in drug prices has shown a 5% decrease in drug consumption. However, because of inflation, drug spending actually increases 5% for every 10% price raise (Becker). So although drug consumption is lessening ever so slightly, more money is being spent. Analyzing the aforementioned statistic shows that drug prices would have to be inflated by 200% to significantly reduce drug consumption, which would mean a huge increase in money spent on drugs. Alternatively, if drugs were legalized, a 200% tax on drugs would give the same decrease in consumption and the same increase in spending; however, governments would finally be making billions from the drug market,
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Wayne Clist
When looking closely at the war on drugs and government policies on the ongoing crusade against illicit substances, we must
by Dan Weaver
Whatever happened to the War on Drugs? Apparently, it has been replaced by the War on Terror. However, two recent events
by Karl Hull
For decades this nation has spent billions of dollars and thousands of lives fighting the war on drugs.Yet, there seems to
by Lori Ryan
I want to tell you a story.
Picture a darkened, half-full parking lot, street lights shining, the distant yells of twenty-somethings
by Stone Handy
The Harm of Drugs vs the War on Drugs.
There is no doubt there are harmful effects from the abuse of drugs, legal and illegal.
View All Articles on:
The harms of drugs versus the harms of the 'War on Drugs'
Add your voice
Know something about The harms of drugs versus the harms of the 'War on Drugs'?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Presidential Climate Action Project (PCAP)
The Presidential Climate Action Project (PCAP) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause....more
hide