Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Law & Justice > Drug Laws & Prevention
Created on: May 11, 2008
The Effective Alternative: Why Drugs Should be Legalized
In hopes of reducing society's drug use, western governments have put immense effort towards the war on drugs'. Unfortunately, this immense effort has shown discouraging results. Even Jane Crist of the White House Office of National Drug Policy admits, "there has been no direct effect on either the price or the availability of [illegal drugs]" (Boaz). There must be an alternative to the failing and costly prohibition. That alternative is the legalization of drugs. Drug legalization would benefit Britain by boosting the economy; regulating drug culture by increasing safety and decreasing violence; and by alleviating the moral restraints imposed by the government, therefore upholding liberal rights of British citizens.
Britain's economy would benefit from taking control of the drug market through legalization. Currently, governments are spending billions to stop drug use (Becker). This attempt is futile, as we are simply seeing more arrests instead of less drug activity. In 1996, 59.6% of federal prisoners in the United States were imprisoned on drug related charges (Boaz). These prisoners are costing massive sums for less than massive crimes. Should drugs be legalized, billions could be saved annually, solely because governments would no longer be spending useless dollars to keep drug offenders in jail.
Legalization would not only save money, but would also boost the economy through taxation. The war on drugs' has created more risk in drug dealing, which makes drug prices swell (Becker). The government assumes that these price increases will generate a decrease in consumption. Unfortunately, addicted users find drugs to be a necessity, not a luxury, and economically, all necessities will be consumed despite any increase in price. In casual users, a 10% increase in drug prices has shown a 5% decrease in drug consumption. However, because of inflation, drug spending actually increases 5% for every 10% price raise (Becker). So although drug consumption is lessening ever so slightly, more money is being spent. Analyzing the aforementioned statistic shows that drug prices would have to be inflated by 200% to significantly reduce drug consumption, which would mean a huge increase in money spent on drugs. Alternatively, if drugs were legalized, a 200% tax on drugs would give the same decrease in consumption and the same increase in spending; however, governments would finally be making billions from the drug market,
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The harms of drugs versus the harms of the 'War on Drugs'
The war on drugs is an industry that purports to serve society, but in many ways creates more criminals. Illegal drug dealing
by Dan Weaver
Whatever happened to the War on Drugs? Apparently, it has been replaced by the War on Terror. However, two recent events
by Stone Handy
The Harm of Drugs vs the War on Drugs.
There is no doubt there are harmful effects from the abuse of drugs, legal and illegal.
by BT Cassidy
This requires a brief answer to two questions first; what are the harms of drugs and what are the harms of the war on drugs.
The "war on drugs" is a as much of a political hot potato over here in England as it is in America. In June 2004, cannabis
View All Articles on: The harms of drugs versus the harms of the 'War on Drugs'
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Should abortion for underage children require parental consent?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
American Dystonia Society (ADS) is dedicated to advancing Dystonia research, promoting patient advocacy and increasing public awareness of this debilitating disease. Our top priority is to maximize delivery of donations and grants to fun...more