There are 8 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #2 by Helium's members.
The World Bank reports that over the past three years global food prices have nearly doubled. I see three primary reasons, and greed isn't one of them.
First, as populations grow and people become wealthier, they change their diet. They demand not only staples, but also now regularly eat once out-of-reach luxuries like meat, dairy, and poultry. All are grain fed. Second are government policies mandating an increased role for biofuels, such as ethanol. This forces the conversion of food to fuel. Third is the high price of petroleum products. Not only fuel, but also fertilizer and agricultural chemicals are now more expensive.
Concerns about climate change drive the push for biofuels. President Bush signed legislation mandating the production of 36 billion gallons of biofuels (most from corn ethanol) by 2022. This is about five times the current level of ethanol production.
Mandates for the production of goods, whether corn or computer chips, set predictable forces in motion. Here's how this experiment with Soviet style command economics works.
U.S. corn subsidies push prices above their natural levels. Farmers respond by moving production out of food crops, like wheat and soybeans, and into corn. As the acres devoted to wheat and soybeans fall, and yields decline, prices for these crops rise. Consumers respond by shifting demand to other grains, such as rice. Increased demand for rice raises its price.
Policies intended to protect unborn generations from the effects of climate change instead harm real people now. Worse still, Science recently reported that, on net, the production of biofuels produces more CO2 emissions than conventional fossil fuels. Can you imagine a more perverse situation?
This is not a problem caused by free markets. The mess above is entirely the product of governmental action. The market process would simply not have produced these sorry results, but policies that distort prices have.
Both government action and markets produce errors in systematic ways. One thing we stress at FREE's conferences is recognizing the circumstances in which such problems occur. We know, for example, that markets often ignore those things that have no price and no owner. Endangered species and ecosystem services are examples.
The ethanol experience illustrates how special interest groups, e.g., corn farmers and large agri-businesses, hijack government policy. They seek unnatural economic profits, those above what they could get in the
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Ethanol and economic threat? Have you checked-out the price of a liter of gasoline in Holland or Germany? Do you mi... read more
by Pete Geddes
The World Bank reports that over the past three years global food prices have nearly doubled. I see three primary rea... read more
by Bob Schmidt
Ethanol threatens the American economy in ways that many never anticipated. The cost of basic foods are skyrocketing,... read more
by Doc Lane
Ethanol does not threaten our economy. Ethanol is not a new fuel source. Ford Motor Company has produced ethanol vehi... read more
While some good can be said about biofuels, they also have a dark side that few are willing to admit to. But what are... read more
View All Articles on:
How ethanol and biofuels threaten our economy
Add your voice
Know something about How ethanol and biofuels threaten our economy?
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Cast your vote!
Click for your side. Must be logged in.
Featured Partner
Taxpayers for Common Sense (TCS) has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse T...more
hide