Home > Religion & Spirituality > Christianity > Christian Beliefs & Culture
Created on: May 06, 2008 Last Updated: May 14, 2008
5/3/08
In St. Peter's Second Epistle, chapter three, verse 16-17, we read: "As also in all his [St. Paul's] epistles, speaking in them of these things: in which are some things hard to be understood, which the unlearned and unstable wrest, as also the other Scriptures, to the own perdition. You therefore, brethren, knowing these things before, beware; lest, being led away by the error of the unwise, you fall from your own steadfastness."
It is obvious - at least to me - that St. Peter is not warning those who read Scripture (we all should!), but those who interpret it to their own destruction. But how could reading - and interpreting Scripture lead to one's perdition? Isn't reading Scripture profitable in all things pertaining to God's revealed word? The answer is simple enough if one sees the proliferation of sects that claim this belief or that - all based on the SAME Scripture verses!
Keeping St. Peter's warning in mind, let us take a close look at the question at hand: Newborns and heaven: is baptism a requirement?
First, I ask all those that are reading my article to think about this: What if I said that for 1,500 (one-thousand-five-hundred) years a group of people from all over the world, professing a religion, were said to be wrong in their beliefs by someone who came along and said that he and only he discovered and knew the real truth of what to believe in order to be saved?
Furthermore, what if I said the man that "discovered" the "real truth" of what is needed to be saved, also threw out seven books of what his predecessors had believed and changed some of the wording of that august book to fit his newly "discovered truth"? In addition, what if those people for 1,500 years had been taught, believed and practiced a certain "ritual" concerning their newborns, only to have that practice condemned or at least declared not necessary for salvation because the real "truth" of the matter had now been "discovered"?
Well, that is what I have read on Helium!
It seems that infant Baptism is not a necessary requirement for salvation. Even though it had always been believed, taught, and practiced for 1,500 years by faithful Catholics who lived and died for the true faith of Christ. Ludicrous! And the "book" that I am talking about is the Bible.
It was Martin Luther (an apostate Catholic priest), a creature of the Creator, who took it upon himself to throw out seven books of the (Creator's) Bible simply because they did not fit in with his version of what the Bible
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Newborns and heaven: A discussion of baptism as a requirement
Sprinkled. Dunked.
I have been both. Both ways, I got wet. Both times were sacred to the onlookers; the latter was sacred
Throughout time, there has been a lot of controversy about whether a child should be baptized, many people believe that
by David Cope
Is baptism required for entry into heaven? The Bible is quite explicit on this
subject. But there is one thing I want to
by Karen Ramos
I believe that it depends on your faith and what you believe. Who are we to judge or to say that it is a requirement or
by David Zacker
Many Christians are under the belief system that you must be baptized to be saved. And that baptism should be performed
View All Articles on: Newborns and heaven: A discussion of baptism as a requirement
Featured Partner
Founded in January 2006, the mission of the Sunlight Foundation is to strengthen the relationship between lawmakers and their constituents by maximizing transparency of the work of Congress, its members, staff and lobbyists. Sunlight bel...more