Home > Sciences > Sciences (Other)
Created on: May 03, 2008
Why have scientists never considered this (following) very important fact on global warming? Is it because sometimes people cannot see the forest for all the trees?
How can a chart that Al Gore produced prove anything? The time span involved and the statistics' he used does not prove anything to me.
How can the melting of the Arctic/Antarctic ice caps be due to human air pollution so far from the polluters?
There's no denying that there's at present a noticeable warming of the atmosphere; but I do not agree, repeat "do not agree", with any of the notable scientists (Al Gore included) that declare this occurrence is due to anthropogenic activities derived from human activities/abuse of the air and environment.
Scientists have been wrong before don't forget that and will be again. We hear all the time of incidents where something was later retracted when more empirical data became known.
Humans have been, and still are, polluting the air and environment, with the consent of our governments. However, this sort of human pollution is NOT RESPONSIBLE for the warming of the atmosphere as I see it.
The only thing that is responsible for the warming of the atmosphere is cosmic entropy and its consequences, and as it is nearing a very critical point certain consequences are accompanying factors - such as weather turbulence.
The reason why the Ozone layer has a hole over the Arctic and Antarctic is because of the decay of organisms on earth. It's said more than 47,000 animal species are on the extinction list and I don't know if that list includes any human species.
A female writer's contribution to Helium said: "Energy must have existed before the big bang because the inherent properties of energy show that it cannot appear or be made from nothing and neither can it cease to be. It's continual, without beginning or end." I agree with her on this point.
It's cosmic entropy which keeps energy moving in cycles in order to produce something on earth, and since entropy is not reversible the only way it can recharge the earth when it is depleted of cosmic energy is by means of a big crunch and to a new big bang again when the restoration of energy has been finished thus completing a cosmic cycle.
This is how it functions:
When organisms decay (and all organisms contain some CO2) a distinct amount of energy is released into the atmosphere, keeping in mind energy is converted from one form to another. This energy always moves toward the cold. Presently, and on account of the vast
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Understanding universal law
Why have scientists never considered this (following) very important fact on global warming? Is it because sometimes people
Universal law can never be really understood, at least by man in his current state. The simplest questions can not be understood
Universal Laws, do they exist and how did they come about? Is there really a Law of Coincidence? Is there really unseen
DECEPTION, ILLUSION, DELUSION AND DEVIATION OF SELF-PERCEPTION
We don't truly see ourselves!
Recently I wrote about the eclipse
by Brian O'Neil
The Big Picture
(As seen by an amoeba)
So as it turned out, the kid never did know what happened to him. He never even got
View All Articles on: Understanding universal law
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Does science support the law of attraction theory?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
The Responsibility Project is the brainchild of Liberty Mutual Insurance. As an insurance company, we like responsible people. Because people who believe in doing the right thing don't just make better people, they make better custome...more