Home > Politics, News & Issues > US Politics > Political Issues
Created on: April 30, 2008
The decision of the supreme court in 2000 for the case of Bush v. Gore was fair and just in that the Florida Supreme Court's method for recounting ballots was unconstitutional as ruled the a 7-2 vote. A legal vote is one in which there is a clear indication of the voter's intent. Since votes in each county could not confirm that they would be counted in the same manner, there was a clear violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution. In a normal case, this decision would have been left to the state supreme court. However, the Chief Justice maintained that the Florida's Supreme Court decision was not proper judging. The recount had to be stopped because it the method was outrageously unfair. One cannot use several methods of recounting and expect to come out with a fair result. Since the Florida Supreme Court could not make a fair decision in this case, it was the duty of the high court to step in and make sure that the case was treated in a just manner which meant putting a stop to the recount. Though it is likely that politics played a role in the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, it was not the overriding factor in this case. I imagine that the US Supreme Court had proper suspicion that the Florida recount may have been manipulated to favor Vice President Gore and therefore acted in an appropriate manner to such a suspicion. Their actions were not only appropriate but also justifiable. If the Supreme Court had not intervened, the battle between Vice President Gore and Governor Bush may have been prolonged. This is no doubt a difficult case that has brought along many controversies since the Supreme Court decided in favor of Governor Bush. However, despite criticisms the decision in Bush v. Gore was fair and just. In looking back, one must understand that this case was not an easy call. The Supreme Court acted in what they felt was the most beneficial and constitutionally appropriate. Had the decision favored Gore, there would still be controversy today over the outcome of the case. It is impossible for the Supreme Court to make decisions that make everyone happy. They must make the best judgment calls necessary according to the laws in which we must follow.
Learn more about this author, Kimberly Holloway.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Why the 2000 election court decision was fair and just
The question of whether or not the 2000 election court decision was fair and just is a highly subjective one; the answer
by James Boyd
The 2000 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Bush v. Gore is confusing from a legal perspective. The
The United States is a country of laws. These laws keep us safe and are generally there to look out for the good of the
The decision of the supreme court in 2000 for the case of Bush v. Gore was fair and just in that the Florida Supreme Court's
The 2000 election of George Walker Bush was not fair and just. It violated the sovereignty of the state of Florida to administer
View All Articles on: Why the 2000 election court decision was fair and just
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Should federal policy support corporate hiring of the poor with tax incentives?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
The mission of Life for Mothers is to reduce maternal and infant mortality rates in developing countries, particularly those in Sub-Saharan Africa, by strengthening healthcare systems and developing, implementing, managing and funding in...more