Channel Button

Hot Topics

There are 39 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #3 by Helium's members.

Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

Presidential Elections 2008

US elections 2008: Whose win would be more historically important: Obama or Clinton?

Results so far:

Obama
63% 213 votes Total: 339 votes
Clinton
37% 126 votes

Since we do not look at a person because of his color any more, but, because of his accomplishments, then, of course, I think Hillary's win would be historically important. That means, that Obama would be just another man who ran for Democratic party against a woman and won or not. I shouldn't think he should go down in history as the first black nominee because that would be discrimination.

Granted, Obama's grandmother is white and that makes him part white, then why do we dwell on the fact that he is black? To me, he is a nice looking, JFK sort of man, with much charisma who can draw the crowds. How he would be in the oval office is another thing. He is young and can be molded into what his advisors wish of him. I believe all the foreign dignitaries would kowtow to him, whereas, with Hillary, and the way they feel about aggressive women, I don't know. I believe Obama is young and trusting, but, something tells me he could easily be "set up" because in a way, I believe he is vulnerable to all the older politicians and if someone wanted him out, then, out he would be. This is providing one of them make it to the White House.

I think Hillary is strong, handles herself well, has some shade in the Clinton past, BUT, she stuck with Bill through his Monica days; however, I would have too, had I been First Lady. She is a senator, has been First Lady and I think after knowing many politicians, she would carry it off well and open doors for other women who would like to to make it in the political world.

Another factor would be that Hillary's husband was once president. She would be the first female nominee who had a husband who was a former president and not one who had a dad as a former president. If Condoleeza Rice ran and won, then, she would be the first female Democratic nominee.

I don't like Obama's pastor but, that should have nothing to do with him personally unless that is what he has been taught going to that very church for the past twenty years. The hate on the Rev. Wright's face is so evident, we do not need that type person even in the U. S. much less as clergy. He says now we took his sermon out of context. I say "NO WAY!"

So, I honestly think, Hillary's win would be the most important.

Learn more about this author, E. V. SHAW.
Contact this writer Click here to send author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

US elections 2008: Whose win would be more historically important: Obama or Clinton?

Clinton
  • 1 of 16

    by Carol Gioia

    The 2008 United States presidential race is historically important on many levels. The unprecedented voter interest ...read more

  • 2 of 16

    by Shawna Blake

    When a boy is small, and innocent of the world's influences, he may dream of one day becoming the President of his co...read more

Obama
  • 1 of 23

    by Michael Cannata

    The historical importance of almost any political event is often not evident until, in fact, the event is actual hist...read more

  • 2 of 23

    by Setsko

    If this argument were to simply come down to the question of "Is it going to be more historically significant if a wo...read more

Add your voice

Know something about US elections 2008: Whose win would be more historically important: Obama or Clinton??
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

What is Helium? | User Guide | Community | Link to Helium | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA