There are 7 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #3 by Helium's members.
Results so far:
| Yes | 62% | 99 votes | Total: 160 votes | |
| No | 38% | 61 votes |
When you ask whether gore should be used in movies and you decide it should not on the basis that it could inspire an act of violence you are surely missing the point. Gore in itself is not the act of violence, rather it is the result of the violence. Gore is also present during benign acts, such as surgery, that would inspire nothing more than a gut reaction, depending on your personal tolerance for 'blood and guts'. As with any creative undertaking, the real question is of context. If the setting demands it, if the story requires it or if by showing it you want to evoke a gut response from your audience then it should not be dismissed summarily as unpleasant and therefore unnecessary.
Setting aside the horror genre for a moment, the reason I can state quite happily that gore has a place in movies is because of the myriad stories, filmed and otherwise, that contain gory scenes and would be a lesser work of art without them. Should we demand that Spielberg remove all the scenes of gore and gory violence from Saving Private Ryan? Would you suggest Francis Ford Coppola tone down The Godfather films? Can we perhaps have a word with Martin Scorsese about the levels of gore in Taxi Driver, Goodfellas or Raging Bull? While we're at it that Shakespeare fella has way too much death and violence in his stories, we really need to reel him in a little. None of the above films could be accused of showing gore for a cheap thrill, nor of being gratuitous and I'd argue that if you have an issue with their content the answer is simple, don't watch them.
Which brings me back to horror films. Because surely the crux of this discussion is not gore within films as much as films whose only apparent reason to exist is to thrill with excessive acts of gory violence.
The debate is surely inflamed by the recent Saw and Hostel franchises, who seem to be trying to outdo each other in the 'yuk' factor. Do these films count as art and what does it say about society that they are extremely popular and profitable? Well it's hardly a new concept, the spectacle of death and suffering has been lauded as entertainment throughout history. We all know the Romans loved to watch Gladiators fight to the death and public executions were commonplace throughout the world up until relatively modern times. These movies are just the modern equivalent and ever since moving pictures have existed acts of violence have been portrayed. Indeed one of the very first short 'films' ever made was a man acting
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
by Philip Brown
Movies are an art form and as such they must represent the vision of the artists involved whether or not the entire a...read more
While it is debatable that movies of the 21st century continue to become more graphically shocking with each passing ...read more
by John Graham
Gore. When I first read the subject of this topic I was horrified. Al Gore should never be used in movies. He is i...read more
Add your voice
Know something about Should gore be used in the movies??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Already a member? Log in.
Featured Partner
MENTOR - National Mentoring Partnership
MENTOR has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse MENTOR's featured titles, p...more
hide