Home > Religion & Spirituality > Christianity > Bible Study
Created on: April 24, 2008
In the professional world of biblical scholarship the idea of biblical inerrancy is rarely given a moment's consideration. In many religious communities, however, the concept is an article of faith, and is vehemently defended by its adherents. Battles rage continually. Each side sporadically accuses the other of intellectual dishonesty and cognitive dissonance. Dogmatism is regularly blamed for the inability of one side to objectively consider the merits of the other's argument. While the dichotomy will no doubt continue through the ages, a few short examples of the fundamental issues involved will prove instructive and may clarify some misunderstanding.
What exactly is meant by the word "inerrant"? For some it means absolutely no mistakes. The Bible is verbatim the word of God. Whatever inconsistencies or errors we may perceive arise only as a result of our own imperfect reading of the text and/or understanding of the world. This position is a rather absolute one, and is easily defended, as any manifestation of contradictions can be conveniently dismissed. For this position to be respected on an academic level, however, it must be able to provide explanations, and those explanations must be logical. Can this explain every alleged error in the Bible?
An example of a text with which absolute inerrantists must interact can be found in 1 Samuel 13:1. The text is translated into English in a number of different ways. The KJV reads, "Saul reigned one year." The NIV reads, "Saul was thirty years old when he became king." In the ESV we find the following: "Saul was . . . years old when he began to reign." In the Septuagint the verse is omitted entirely; 1 Samuel 13 begins with verse 2. The question of Saul's age when he began to reign may seem trivial to some, but if the argument is that there are no errors anywhere in the Bible, it is critical. The Hebrew of the verse is elementary. It reads, ben shanah s'aul b'malko. Literally translated, "Saul was one year old when he began to reign." Ben shanah means "son of a year," and it is a Hebrew idiom used to designate an animal or human in its first year of life. It is the phrase used in the instructions to sacrifice animals "of the first year." In Modern Hebrew, one gives their age with the formula "son/daughter of ___ years." Saul, however, was not an infant when he became king. The academic answer is that Saul's age, at some point, was accidentally omitted from a transcription. The error has since been perpetuated due
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
The Bible: Human authors, fallible teaching
In the professional world of biblical scholarship the idea of biblical inerrancy is rarely given a moment's consideration.
The bible answers the question as to the humanity of its author in 2 Timothy 3:16, all scripture is given by inspiration
Human Authors Are Fallible
One of the hallmarks of humanity is that we will not always agree with each other. On the negative
by F.J. Foster
It is amazing how often a topic of this sort pops up. In most cases, those who question the Bible's accuracy offer the same
The Bible as we know it today is full of contradictions and fallacies. We know this, yet we believe with full force in it's
View All Articles on: The Bible: Human authors, fallible teaching
Helium Debate
Cast your vote!
Can Christians ever manage to reclaim Christmas as a holy day?
Click for your side.
Featured Partner
Arts for All Ages is a non-profit organization that travels to schools, extended-day programs, daycare's, homeless shelters, and foster homes with the intent of giving children the opportunity to experience and experiment with the perfor...more