There are 13 articles on this title. You are reading the article ranked and rated #6 by Helium's members.
Did the founding fathers intend to protect us from terrorists at all costs?
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."(1) - Benjamin Franklin
In The Rights of Man, Thomas Paine asserts that "a Nation has at all times an inherent indefeasible right to abolish any form of government it finds inconvenient, and establish such as accords with its interest, disposition, and happiness." He saw the American Revolution as the first true revolution, a revolution in the very "principle and construction" of government.(2) He foretold that this revolution would sweep humanity along "on a system of universal peace [based] on the indefeasible hereditary Rights of Man."(3) Perhaps Paine was being a little too optimistic.
The America of today is a far cry from being that shining beacon of liberty and freedom to the world. Instead, we have become the very oppressors we once sought to liberate ourselves from. It is believed that we now have over 1000 military bases worldwide(4) as well as 6000 placed in US territories(5), and "well over half a million soldiers, spies, technicians, teachers, dependents, and civilian contractors in other nations."(6)
The very idea that we should be willing to sacrifice any of our hard-won civil liberties "temporarily" for the sake of homeland security until the terrorist threat has been defeated is unthinkable. First let us examine the concept of 'temporarily'. When and how is the terrorist threat going to be decisively eliminated? Is there, as we first thought during the aftermath of 9/11, a single enemy that we can point out, hunt down, and destroy? I believe that we are still looking for Osama bin Laden, the first such chosen culprit. We have removed former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein from power and watched him beheaded, but what has that changed?
The war on terror is like the war on drugs; a never-ending battle against a faceless enemy which is sure to win popular support and permissive funding. It feeds on the fears and insecurities of an uninformed public to advance the power and influence of the executive branch and its corporate interests. The powerful have always been quick to take advantage of such. Adolph Hitler knew that the "efficiency of the truly national leader consists primarily in preventing the division of the attention of a people, and always in concentrating it on a single enemy."(7) Our current administration learned
Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:
Well over twenty years ago when I worked as a rookie U.S. Federal Agent in Miami, I watched George Orwell's 1984 and ... read more
by Jim Shepard
America is freedom! Or should I say was. People come to this country for two main reasons, freedom and money. Free... read more
No one has ever called me a liberal when it comes to politics. I am a classic conservative; a Reagan Republican. Sinc... read more
by Ashley Scott
"America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroye... read more
Foremost to appreciate what is actually going on with the Patriot Act and to understand how it really came about. In ... read more
View All Articles on:
How patriotic is the Patriot Act?
Add your voice
Know something about How patriotic is the Patriot Act??
We want to hear your view.
Write now!
Already a member? Log in.
Cast your vote!
Click for your side. Must be logged in.
Featured Partner
Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting
The Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting is an innovator in international nonprofit journalism. It goes beyond the hea...more
hide