Search Helium

Home > Sciences > Social Science > Anthropology > Anthropology (Other)

Flaws in the evolution theory

by Ben Naude

Created on: December 10, 2006   Last Updated: March 10, 2009

By far the largest problem with evolution theory is that everyone keeps on forgetting that it is in fact nothing more and nothing less that just a theory there are no facts supporting it. It is but one persons idea of what might have happened.
Yes, small scale evolution does exist as organisms adapts to their surroundings through survival of the fittest only those organisms with the genes best suited for there environment gets the change to past them on since they are the only ones that survives.


But to induce from this that we all stemmed from one single source is a wild theory which makes the assumption that everything in this universe happens purely by chance and all that we are we are because we need it to survive. Does everything that you have just enable you to survive your emotions, your feelings your consciousness? Does the fact that you have a soul contribute in anyway to your survival in this world? Or are all of these things mere accidents of evolution?
The intricate nature of just humans, not even speaking of the rest of the creation, ought to be a clear signal that there were some plan in the creation of all that we know, some force had to guide everything into some direction. It is simply impossible to conceive that it was all merely by accident that humans have become, built and achieved everything that they have.
The interesting notion exists that it more probable the basis of evolution that Leonardo de Vinci's Mona Lisa will by chance by formed by the winds in a desert than it is that one single human will evolve from nothing to what we are today.
I haven't seen any painting in the dessert so far and are not going to believe that such intricate work will just come to be without a guiding hand without at least some proof.
How is it that we so readily believe in evolution without any scientifically basis other than it would answer a question or two even thought that it creates much more question than the one or two it answers. For instance, lets say evolution was true where did that first organism come from? Lets say it just appeared after the big bang what is it that urged it to survive, to reproduce? What is it that gave it the capability to reproduce? What is that created the forces that resulted in the big bang?
In the end, there is only one answer there was some plan. And it there was a plan, there is no room for the notion of pure evolution.

Learn more about this author, Ben Naude.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Helium Debate

Cast your vote!

Is cryptozoology a valid science?

Click for your side.

91857

Featured Partner

A Day of Hope

A Day of Hope has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse A Day of Hope's featured titles, pick an issue and write! You can also donate your article earnings. Share what you know, learn n...more


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA
#