Where Knowledge Rules

Politics, News & Issues:

Environment

Debate_icon Get a Widget for this title

Should government subsidize renewable energy sources such as wind, solar and ethanol?

Title endorsed in part by:

Results so far:

No
22% 110 votes Total: 508 votes
Yes
78% 398 votes

On December 18, 2007, President G.W. Bush signed into law the Energy Independence and Security Act which, among other initiatives, specifies a six-fold increase in the production of ethanol to 36 billion gallons by the year 2022. The problem? While ethanol may help wean nations off foreign oil, it also increases the price of food worldwide as corn, soybeans, and sugar are used for fuel. In turn, it leads to increased hunger, not to mention global warming.

I believe the government should subsidize renewable energy sources, but it should be very discerning about which ones are the most eco-friendly and efficient. For example, let's take wind energy.

The State of Texas, well recognized for its historical role in oil production, is now experiencing a new energy boom: only the energy in question isn't bubbling up from wells in the ground, it's being generated from huge wind turbines whirring and humming their way to energy independence. The ecological impact of wind energy is minimal and includes some cases of avian bird deaths and erosion.

Solar power is another clean renewable that should be increasingly subsidized by the government, particularly in the area of nanotechnology. Imagine one day the paint on your entire electric car is manufactured with tiny nano-solar collectors. Imagine if all paint everywhere; on buildings, homes, streets, rooftops, and buses; contained these tiny nano-solar collectors. While it may sound fantastic, it is possible; and increased government subsidies in this area would help speed along research and development.

Yet another alternative energy that is becoming increasingly popular is tidal stream. Essentially, tidal stream is a wind turbine that sits on the ocean floor, collecting electricity by harnessing tidal currents in much the same way that a wind turbine harnesses wind. Tidal stream is yet another example of a clean, eco-friendly renewable.

In summary, the government should most certainly subsidize renewable energy sources. In doing so, it performs its duty of protecting the American people and setting us on a course of energy independence. However, it must be very careful about which renewables it chooses to subsidize, ensuring not only energy independence but also the health and well-being of the environment.

177155_m Learn more about this author, Daniel J. Gansle.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.


Below are the top articles rated and ranked by Helium members on:

Should government subsidize renewable energy sources such as wind, solar and ethanol?

Yes
No
  • 1 of 9

    by Shannon Courtney

    Renewable energy alternatives such as solar panels, wind turbines and ethanol provide consumers, communities and countries

    read more

  • 2 of 9

    by Allan Taylor

    I have voted no, but it is not a black and white situation, as are most propositions.

    Politicians are always driven by

    read more

Add your voice

Know something about Should government subsidize renewable energy sources such as wind, solar and ethanol? ?
We want to hear your view. Write_penWrite now!

124396

Featured Partner

E Square

E Square has partnered with Helium, giving you the chance to write for a cause. Browse E Square's featured title...more

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA