Join | Log in

Channel Button
Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

US News

Get a Widget for this title

Should Southwest Airlines ban women passengers who show too much

Results so far:

No
74% 121 votes Total: 164 votes
Yes
26% 43 votes
No

I fly Southwest at least twice a month, primarily because it's the only airline that offers non-stops from my city to Las Vegas. It is also a really cool organization. Fares are cheap, crews are friendly and there is rarely a delay. So, what's all the flap about women being kicked off flights because they wear skimpy clothes?

It has happened twice in recent weeks, and lawyers are already scurrying around trying to find ways to get some SW cash for their shapely clients. And for themselves, naturally. If this cash-for-flesh trend continues, the lawyers may grab almost as much money from the airline as they get from chasing doctors and cigarette makers. Hey, it's a lucrative living.

Reports from SW say the reason for the bareness ban is because of objections to the exposed skin that come from other passengers. What other passengers? Jealous old librarian maiden ladies? As a male, albeit a very old one, I have no complaints about pretty young women showing their wares. That's one of the reasons I fly SW to Las Vegas.

However, I do object to the 400-pound men or women passengers who haven't taken a bath in a month, and inevitably plop down in the seat next to me and overflow into mine. I also object to mothers who bring their poopy infants aboard to bawl, barf and bounce next to me throughout the entire flight.

Having said all that, I don't understand Southwest's current prissy attitude at all. When I first started flying with that cool airline in the 70s, their stews (flight attendants) all wore short, short hot pants and go-go boots. It made flying so much more pleasant as they sashayed the aisles and leaned over to serve their appreciative male passengers.

Learn more about this author, Ted Sherman.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Yes

It is the right of a business to ban individuals from their premises when certain rules of propriety are broken. However, it is the responsibility of that business to make certain that their rules are posted where they can easily be examined by the public at large. And in the case of the incident with Southwest Airlines, the decision should have been made by their check in personnel, or in the waiting room prior to boarding the plane, and not on the plane by a stewardess. And the individual who is being denied access to the flight should be told of the reason as privately as possible, to avoid embarrassment and a possible scene, and the opportunity to change into more appropriate attire.

Many businesses, particularly restaurants, refuse to serve patrons who are improperly dressed and this seldom causes an issue. But, most restaurants, have signs posted at or near the entrance allowing the public to know what is expected. Obviously, no one would want to eat in a place where a large, hairy man is sitting bare chested or in a tank top. Or in a restaurant where a number of patrons are sitting in their bare feet. In most instances a little "common sense" goes a long way. And that is part of the problem today. Too few people have "common sense" anymore or have any idea of what "common sense" is.

And I do agree with another writer, who stated that if a business is going to have rules for the way a woman dresses, they need to have rules for men also. Nothing is more unattractive than to see a young adult or teenage man wearing bagging jeans pulled halfway down their thighs with their boxer shorts showing. Yet too many of us are forced to see this fashion statement on a daily basis.

I'm fairly certain that no one would even be discussing this issue, if it had concerned a loud, belligerent, drunken individual, man or woman. First of all few people I know want to spend 2 or 3 hours or more sitting next to a loud mouth drunk. Likewise, few families who are flying with children want to be continually telling their children not to stare at someone who is dressed inappropriately. And again this could be either a man or woman.

Part of the problem is the way many airlines had their stewardesses dressing just a few short years ago. I can remember flights I was on in the military when all of the stewardesses were showing lots of cleavage and were wearing very short skirts. But, that was back when the majority of the stewardesses seemed to be in their early to mid twenties and thirties. Today's stewardesses and stewards seem to be a more mature group and the airlines are having them dress, not only more age appropriate, but more appropriately for the comfort of all their passengers.

Finally, this and other problems of appropriate decorum could be solved by parents being more involved in the dress of their children. If today, as in the mid twentieth century, individuals had been taught how to dress when in public there would be no problem. Let's face it some clothing is appropriate for a singles bar, but not the public at large.

Learn more about this author, Arthur Gibson.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA