Should the number of presidential primary debates be limited to three for each party?

by Geraldine Daniels

Absolutely NO. The founding fathers built this country on the principle of democracy. Democracy gives everyone a voice; it's all about choices. Although it is sometimes gruesome...read more

by Tom Ontis

Presidential debates, while tedious at times and very self serving, encourage the people of the country to become involved in the democratic process. The debates, as formatted,...read more

by Katherine Harms

The electoral process needs to find its own way in regard to debates, advertising and any other element of the campaign process. Voters need the opportuntity to meet the candid...read more

by Jeff Franklin

The number of debates should not be limited so the candidates can be questioned on as many issues as possible and practical. But I ask this question: what good are any number o...read more

by C Wells

Freedom to choose the President of our wonderful country should not be limited to three of each recognized party - that would be putting limits to our freedom which is constitut...read more

by Ronald Gibson

I am relieved to see there are so far no articles on the Yes side, but with this being the third article written that doesn't mean much. With so many candidates to choose from i...read more

by Joseph Malek

Clearly, every responsible voter within the United States of America needs to see and understand the political positions of each and every candidate. They also want to know whic...read more