Should the number of presidential primary debates be limited to three for each party?

No

7 of 7

by Ronald Gibson

Write now Print Invite a writer™ Add to Favorites RSS Feed Contact this writer

I am relieved to see there are so far no articles on the Yes side, but with this being the third article written that doesn't mean much. With so many candidates to choose from it is difficult to really know who is the best one without unlimited supplies of debates. Also many people only watch one or two candidates they have the ost supprt for but if they suddenly become disenchanted with their chosen candidates they need to have a way to decide where to take their support. Then of course there is the issue of certain so-called second tier candidates being prevented from showing themselves to voters at many of the debates. My fellow supporters of Congressman Ron Paul have been squawking about that frequently during the course of this year. Having more debates gives these candidates more chances to explain and defend their positions to the American People. Of course it shouldn't need to be mentioned that limiting the debates is an infringement on our right to know as much as we can about our candidates and interferance with the Democratic Process.

Learn more about this author, Ronald Gibson.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.