Politics, News & Issues >
People in the News
Get a Widget for this title
RSS FeedPresident Bush's 2007 Labor Day visit to Iraq: Smart leadership or foolish risk?
Results so far:
| Smart | 41% | 21 votes | Total: 51 votes | |
| Foolish | 59% | 30 votes |
Smart
Write now
Print
Invite a writer™
Add to FavoritesI think President bush was smart to do this. Smart in leadership of the many fighting forces that are there ,representing our country. What is wrong with the president showing up in a hostile country ? The American people have wanted him to go . The only things I have heard on television and in the papers ,were if Bush was over there he would see what it was like for our love ones.
I have to say it people , he went. If President Bush were to light a fire under the backsides of Iraq government , this was the wisest thing that he could have done. I stand up and applaud the man , in that retrospect of his term . President Bush did not have to go, he could have waited and let the next President worry about the mess. Bush probably felt this was something he had to jump start him self . I think he went to Iraq to give the visibility of presence to the people of Iraq , that if he were to keep the U.S. soldiers in Iraq , for there protection . Iraq's Government will have to get off of the power play and get busy.
Smart ! I think it is the smartest thing he has done since he has been in office .Foolish would have been to let some one else take care of it. The people of the United States have been on , " The Bush Beaters Band Wagon " to long now, Give the President a break . My Dad always told me , " You give a man enough rope , he will hang himself". I tend to give the man a chance , for diplomacy sake , I give him the benefit of the doubt , as to whether it was smart to do or not .
I guess what I see what sets him apart from recent Presidents . The ones that gave orders to fire cruise missiles into Afghanistan training camps , and leave it at that. Then you have the time they sent out troops to Somalia , and we tucked our tails and ran from there , because it was making the President Clinton look bad in public interest.
In The Words Of Jesus, " Let he who is with out sin < cast the first stone". Amen
Learn more about this author, Rex Coker.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Foolish
Just another case of W's befuddled thinking. The best case scenario allowed him to grandstand in al-Anbar, but the worst case scenario would have given us a new president, Dick Cheney. Was the benefit of being able to brag to the Assistant Prime Minister of Australia that "We're kicking ass in Iraq" really worth the risk? Imagine the impact if his plane had been downed. It was a foolhardy act in a war zone. Within days, one of the Sunni Shieks who he met had been assassinated by al-Qaeda. How did that help Iraq?
G.W. Bush has a history of pursuing photo ops, regardless of the facts or pragmatism. Remember the "Mission Accomplished" sign and speech aboard the aircraft carrier? It turned out that not only was the mission not completed, but he had to escalate the conflict in order to complain he is making progress. Far more Americans and Iraqis have been killed after "Mission Accomplished" than before. It shows how focused he is on image over substance. Obviously, he wanted the mission to have been accomplished, but he jumped the gun, because years later, the mission is far from accomplished with no end in sight.
What could possibly be smart about putting the chief executive in profound danger? It didn't have any significant bearing on the war effort and there was nothing particularly significant about the timing, except that he was already scheduled to travel to Australia. It did highlight the fact that the American military is now cooperating with Sunni tribal leaders in the province, but that could have been accomplished without the risk. Apparently, Bush has a daredevil streak.
The other thing that the Bush visit to Iraq emphasized is that he did not trust Prime Minister al-Maliki enough to even hint that he might visit Iraq. That is a telling statement on their relationship, on the level of sectarian violence in Iraq and on the level of sovereignty exercised by the Iraqi government. Thus, the pluses of the visit do not overwhelm the minuses. In fact, some would argue that the minuses exceed the pluses. A huge risk was taken for a marginal benefit at best.
This action speaks volumes of George W. Bush. It indicates how concerned he is about his public image. It also shows that he is painfully aware of how strongly linked his legacy is with the war in Iraq. As Glen Beck stated on the Headline News channel, although referring to Iranian President Ahmedinejad: "If you repeat a lie often enough, some people will eventually believe you."
Learn more about this author, Robert C. Sage.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Difference of opinion? Debate now.
- People in the News
- Should Prince Harry have been sent to Afghanistan?
- Should Bush and Cheney be indicted for war crimes?
- Should Michael Vick have received a stronger sentence?
- Should Mike Svonavec sell his land cheap just because Flight 93 crashed on it on 9/11?
- Was Tricia Walsh Smith justified in using YouTube to tell her story?
