My Helium | Join | Log in Where Knowledge Rules

Politics, News & Issues:

Sports News & Opinion

Debate_icon

RSS RSS Feed

Get a Widget for this title

Is Barry Bonds' 756 home run ball worth $500,000?

Results so far:

No
62% 193 votes Total: 312 votes
Yes
38% 119 votes
No

I don't think Barry Bonds' 756 home run ball is worth $500,000.00. I know collectors pay that kind of money for sports memorabilia all the time but I can't see where this ball is worth that much money. Yes it is a one of a kind and a valuable piece of baseball history. The significance of the ball is that it's the ball that broke Hank Aaron's all time home run record. But Barry went on to hit 6 more home runs the current record is now 762 which has a tremendous effect on the value of #756.

In order to establish a value for an item you look for comparisons. You have to take the current market situation and economy and try to guess what someone is willing to pay for the ball. The popularity of the player has a lot to do with it also. A fair comparison can be made by the baseballs purchased by Todd McFarlane. In 1998 McFarlane purchased Mark McGwire's 70th and final home run ball for a record 3 million dollars. He later purchased Barry Bonds' 73rd home run ball for $450,000.00 dollars. That's a dramatic difference for two record breaking baseballs. I would think that since #73 is the new record it would have sold for at least the same amount as #70.

Therefore based on the prices realized at auction can we assume that Barry Bonds' record breaking baseballs don't sell for as much as Mark McGwires? There might be some truth in that. There are some other factors effecting the value of the ball. Likeability is a huge factor. When McGwire was going for the single season record he was battling it out with Sammy Sosa. Everyone loved the competition and instantly loved these men. They smiled all the time; they were charismatic, cheerful and above all nice. The dark cloud of steroids hadn't yet entered the game. The media and fans were eating this duel up and to many it brought back memories of Maris and Mantle in 1961.

The atmosphere was much different when Bonds was chasing McGwire's record. The same interest wasn't there. That also applies to Bonds' run at Hank Aaron's all time record. Barry wasn't competing with another player on a daily basis. He also had to contend with allegations of steroid use during this time so I think people felt that the all time record might be tainted. Hank Aaron was also a much respected man within baseball and many people didn't want his record to be broken by someone suspected of cheating. Major League Baseball did nothing to help out the situation either. They kept the fans wondering if Aaron or Selig would be at the game when the record was broken. These actions cast a shadow over the whole chase as if MLB was not so happy about Bonds breaking the record.

One of the biggest factors may be that Todd McFarlane got caught up in the frenzy of the home run race in 1998 and overpaid for the balls to begin with. Todd purchased Mark McGwire's 63rd, 67th, 68th, and 69th home run balls. He also bought Sammy Sosa's 33rd (which broke the all-time record for round-trippers in a month), 61st and 66th home run balls. All of these balls were purchased in a series of separate deals totaling about $300,000.00. Todd claims he bought these balls due to "a combination of business, charity and self-indulgence to the nth degree." I also think that he was banking on the fact that no one else was going to challenge this record for a long time.

The fact that Bonds beat McGwire's record just 3 years later probably had something to do with the ball selling for much less. I think buying this baseball for $500,000.00 is not a good buy. It is too high when you consider the market for similar balls has already been established at a lot less.

Learn more about this author, Jay Nolan.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Yes

In September of 2007, fashion designer Marc Ecko purchased Barry Bond's 756 home run ball for $750,000. Then Ecko set up a web site letting fans vote on the fate of the recording breaking ball. We, the fans, decided to either send the ball to Cooperstown (the baseball Hall of Fame), launch it into space, or brand it with an asterisk to denote that Bonds most likely (okay, almost undoubtedly) used steroids while breaking the record, thus cheating his way into the record books.

So was $750,000 a fair price to pay for Bond's infamous ball? On the one hand, yes. It's worth exactly what the highest bidder is willing to pay for it. On the other, I don't believe you can really put a price tag on something so controversial. It did not fetch $750,000 at auction because it is a priceless piece of baseball history. Many fans even refuse to acknowledge that Bonds holds the record, and history might judge his accomplishment in the same manner. It sold for that amount be someone (in this case, Ecko) wanted to make a point about drug use in baseball.

I don't know anything about Marc Ecko, but I have to give him credit for this move. He did something that in today's world seemed pretty special - have gave the power of decision to the people, where it belongs. He said, "I'll let the fans decide the fate of the ball." I have to say, it was flattering. Finally someone wanted to listen to us, the fans. We follow baseball, reading about it, talking about it, watching it, spending our money on it. When do we get a say in what happens? When do we get to weigh in on the steroids debate?

Well, Ecko gave us that opportunity. And we took advantage of it. The fans voted overwhelmingly to brand the ball with an asterisk and send it to Cooperstown.

To the fans, this was a rejection of the steroids era of baseball. It sent a clear signal to Bud Selig and the rest of the league that the fans don't like cheaters (especially cheaters who won't admit they cheated). We want baseball cleaned up, we want the records of the past set by Hank Aaron and Babe Ruth and Ty Cobb and Nolan Ryan (et al) to be held sacred by today's players, as they are still held sacred by most fans.

Learn more about this author, Sean Curtis.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA