Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 37% | 20 votes | Total: 54 votes | |
| No | 63% | 34 votes |
I chose to write on the "Yes" side of the question upon which this debate is centered because, if students are not taught effective ways to avoid infectious diseases, they are likely to become sick. Sick students cannot be taught to their maximum benefit. If they die, teaching has been futile.
It is not enough just to teach students about preventing the spread of infectious diseases. Parents, guardians and everyone else in students' homes need to be taught also. They all need to be taught and persuaded to practice disease prevention.
School curricula should definitely have disease prevention as a priority component. Moreover, school curricula should include the goal of educating everyone, in each child's home environments, about the prevention of infectious diseases.
Students are never too young to begin to learn about ways to protect themselves from infectious diseases. Lessons about disease prevention should start at the earliest levels of schooling. That is when the parents of students should also begin to be taught whatever they have not already learned about preventing the spread of infectious diseases.
It is true that, in many homes, children are taught to practice good principles of cleanliness and hygiene. It is true that these lessons start when many children are very young. However, as many teachers can attest, practices of cleanliness and good hygiene are either not taught, or not practiced in the homes of all of their students. Annually, many, many teachers are absent from their classrooms because they have gotten illnesses from contact with their students.
It is never too soon to begin to teach students about the invisible world of microbes (bacteria, mold spores and viruses, etc.). These teachings can start at early levels of schooling. Children will understand. Even if such lessons begin at home, they need to be reinforced and expanded upon at school. Parents and teachers need to work together to develop and implement effective ways to motivate students to constantly practice good hygiene. this is especially so whenever and wherever the following kinds of activities take place:
1. Eating meals, snacks, etc. (especially in cafeterias, lunchrooms,
restaurants, etc.
2. Using toilets, bathrooms. outhouses, etc. for the elimination of
bodily wastes
3. Interacting with schoolmates, teachers and others in school
activities
4. Riding buses, attending assemblies, engaging in sports, etc.
A major challenge for parents, teachers and others will always be to have students curb their natural tendency to reach out and touch, or speak directly into the faces of other persons when they are excited and enthused and anxious to share their experiences and emotions. Nevertheless, children need to be helped to remember to restrain themselves in those situations, most especially during cold and flu seasons.
In many instances, there is the need to make greater efforts to motivate parents, guardians and others to get children to doctors,hospitals or clinics sooner, rather than later, when signs of illness are evident. It is also necessary for parents to be strongly motivated to keep sick students at home, instead of allowing them to go to school where they can spread their illnesses to schoolmates.
Prior to the onset of puberty and prior to the beginning of sexual activity, students need to be informed about social diseases. Students need to be accurately informed about the dangers of infection, methods of spread and the dire consequences of acquiring social diseases. It has long been known that this kind of education is not provided to the majority of students at home. Parents, teachers and others need to cooperate to ensure that students are taught, all that they can benefit from learning, about social diseases.
It may be unfortunate, but it is not advisable to have students wait until they get into high school health classes to become informed about the risks of sexual activity and the consequences of getting infected with social diseases. By then, it is far too late, for far too many students.
Much is said about young persons making choices for themselves and the need for them to consistently make wise choices. Many parents welcome the assistance and cooperation of teachers, and other school personnel, as they try to give their children the understandings, sensitivities and inclinations that can help them resist negative pressures and temptations and make those wiser choices.
Learn more about this author, Calsue Murray.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Should disease prevention curriculum often be one of the highest priorities for teachers in certain environments? Yes, but as many people die from hunger often times as from diseases. It's like with giving food to starving people in third-world countries. The food helps them for a time, but they need more.
What needs to happen is for us to fix their entire economy. And right now we're not even managing our own very well. We will need to fix our own before we can focus as fully as we should on fixing other economies. At any rate, disease prevention will not matter all that much if the economy is so bad that they'll starve to death anyway.
My point is, there is not a single physiological cause we can point to all the time and say 'this is what we should focus on.' In some Arab countries treatment of women and moral ethics are one of the biggest needs so that people will stop killing one another. Disease prevention, moral ethics, and the knowledge needed for a people to positively affect their economy may all be needed in different settings.
Furthermore , 'disease prevention curriculum' sounds like a good thing at first. But as history has shown, people have many different ideas about what such a phrase means. Is this a buzz word for abortionists thinking in terms of contraception and perhaps ultimately the destruction of human life? And to what degree will abstinence be focused on as a preventive factor to diseases like AIDS?
I am not decidedly against birth control yet, but the fact remains that the root cause behind all these problems is people making bad decisions. It is the reason those third-world countries have such poor economies that their peoples are starving.
Ironically, a statement that might be used by others is 'an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure', as said by Ben Franklin. However, is birth control really prevention and not cure? For birth control does not always work, is not always used properly even when people know how to use it, and is not fixing the real root issues that cause the problem.
People are making poor decision. They are sleeping promiscuously. They are sleeping in same-sex situations. These are the reasons diseases like AIDS have become so problematic. Even if we throw some birth control devices at them, is does not protect them fully from the risks they are making as a result of their bad decisions, and we are not helping them stop making the original bad decisions that support economies built around prostitution and involving child sex slaves.
You see, sexually transmitted diseases are just one of the negative outgrowths of countries that do not practice sexual morality. Birth control might help fix one of the problems, for the most part, but does not hit to the root cause that results in other problems as well.
Now, until we can fix the economies of other nations by instructing their peoples on the principles of economic success, education on 'disease prevention curriculum' including the practices of both birth control and abstinence probably should be taught. However, the problem is just WHAT exactly will be taught?
The problem with teaching on birth control is that its proponents often do so in teaching a sexually promiscuous life is alright, and the fact that it results in so many diseases is proof otherwise. No birth control can guarantee the avoidance of consequences for bad lifestyle choices. And teaching on birth control OR abstinence may result in further immoral behavior depending on how it is presented, since people may be more likely to get involved in an activity when they are told not to do it.
There are a lot of factors involved here, a lot of things to be thought about, and we need to be careful in how we approach the problems involved.
Learn more about this author, Joshua Zambrano.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.