Home > Politics, News & Issues > News > US News
Results so far:
| Private | 29% | 77 votes | Total: 269 votes | |
| Govt. | 71% | 192 votes |
Private
Created on: August 09, 2007
It should definitely be the private businesses in control. We've seen what happens when you put the government in charge of things and it's usually not very good. Look at the horrible incident in Minnesota. Apparently, Minnesota officials were warned in 1990 that the bridge that collapsed into the Mississippi River was "structurally deficient," yet they simply relied on patchwork repairs to get the job done.
Equally as terrible was the collapse of the Big Dig tunnel in Boston on July 11, 2006. The head of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, the government department in control of the tunnel, said that a steel "tieback" that had held a 40-foot section of ceiling gave way, letting the concrete slabs loose as cars drove beneath them.
Had the management of these structures been under control of private businesses solely responsible for their structure and safety, it's more than likely that the proper repairs would have been made, and many pointless deaths would have been avoided.
I say this because the government in the U.S. has tons of things on it's plate and is very rarely able to deal with the important issues, such as war, crime, poverty, and health. Therefore, it's no surprise to me that such a little thing as a bridge or tunnel would be completely overlooked.
On the other hand, private businesses are created for the care of specific problems. These business get their money in making sure that everything is done correctly and at the right time, and they only have their specific industry to worry about. The possibility of a business that is in control of a bridge overlooking structural malfunctions as being "unimportant" is non-existent.
Bridges and tunnels are just as important in our lives as normal roads. Everyone drives on or through them every single day, and it is ridiculous that we should be forced to make a sign of the cross or feel any kind of fear whenever we must enter one. The government is not usually able to understand what is very important in every day "civilian" life, but a private business understands this concept so much, they've made their livings keeping others safe and giving us free reign to travel.
If the government could give the people more control over many things, America would be a much better place. But if they could start by handing over control of bridges and tunnels, many lives would be saved in future.
Learn more about this author, Blair Bordelon.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Govt.
Created on: August 06, 2007 Last Updated: April 01, 2009
Bridges and tunnels should never be left to private companies to manage. There would always be the danger that cost-cutting would mean less inspection, less inspection could be disastrous. It's not that private companies are not trustworthy, most are, it's just that there must be regulations concerning the care of these potential hazardous byways. Even one left unchecked is too much.
The government, when all is said and done, is the only concern that is capable of regulating such vast systems. It has been shown, if one cares to look, that a business is designed to earn money, and if it does not earn money it cannot stay in business. What if the private business that sees over the bridges and tunnels decides to cut back on operating expenses to save money? Would some repairs that are needed get delayed? Possibly.
The government needs money too, but it can earn money in other ways other than risking the life of those going through the tunnels and over the bridges. It can, as it usually does, raise the taxes, put a toll on the bridges. (I heard a TV comments a few days ago that toll bridges were usually well kept bridges. If this is so, then put the tolls back on bridges.
(An added note) Now that we are in a recession, or near it, and momey is being handed out right and left to give the economy a boost, it is hoped that some of the money the government will be spending will be to check and regulate the older bridges that may need an overhauling. Not to do this is too risky. Most of the bridges and tunnels were put in place years ago and are much in need of being kept repaired. The same way with old and crumbling cities. Nothing man-made lasts forever and instead of wasting money on creating needless new buildings and bridges, the most economical way would be to keep those still usable in good shape.
When a bridge goes down and lives are lost, usually then stricter regulations are put into place to prevent others such accidents. Why not regulate their inspection so closely that problem areas, loose nuts and bolts and whatever else is keeping these thoroughfares safe for navigating, will be found out long before the structure gives away. I remember well when the Silver Bridge that spanned Point Pleasant WV and Marietta Ohio went done during a five oclock rush hour. I never drive across a bridge that I don't think of that horrible accident and say a brief prayer for the victims and that accidents like this will never happen again. That tragedy happened in the later latter part of the sixties.
Learn more about this author, Effie Moore Salem.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.