Join | Log in

Channel Button
Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

Family Law

Get a Widget for this title

Should US citizens accused of domestic abuse lose the right to bear arms?

Results so far:

No
37% 185 votes Total: 505 votes
Yes
63% 320 votes
No

In the United States, there is an important concept prevalent in the courtroom and in mainstream society. People are innocent until proven guilty. In other words, until the accuser has provided sufficient proof in the eyes of the court, the person being accused is innocent.

An innocent person should not have any of their rights removed. In America, we don't punish people, simply because someone said that they did something wrong. We wait, we hear both sides of the issue, we weight the evidence, and when everything has properly been taken into account, then we judge - not before.

Now, it can be argued that there is little harm in taking away someone's firearms temporarily just to be safe. After all, lives will be saved. If you err on the side of the gunowner - it may cost someone their life. If you err on the side of the accuser, you provide a slight inconvenience to someone for a few months.

While there is some merit to that view, it overlooks the potential for abuse. It would be very easy to make an accusation against someone, in order to disarm them, and then take advantage of the fact that they are unarmed.

But more importantly, it's the principal of it. We don't deprive innocent people of their rights (unless they are enemy combatants - but that's another story).

Learn more about this author, Adam Greenwood.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Yes

A better way to word this would be: should citizens convicted of domestic abuse lose the right to bear arms? An accusation is not a conviction, and even though we're talking semantics here, it is an important distinction. Should someone be convicted of any crime in which another person is physically hurt, I believe their right to bear arms should be taken away or severely limited.

When restricting a person from bearing arms, we often only limit them from legally bearing arms. A gun can be purchased illegally by anyone who wants one, and by limiting the right to bear arms, we may be dropping them off the radar of legal observation, allowing them to slip through undetected until they have again committed another crime.

Even so, I still believe in restrictions for law-breakers. We, law-abiding citizens of the United States have the fundamental right to bear arms, guaranteed us by the Bill of Rights in our Constitution. When someone commits a crime however, they often have their freedoms restricted for at least a time. This comes through jail/prison time, probation, etc., and is a consequence for breaking the law.

When someone has proved his/herself to be a law-breaker who may choose to harm someone, they lose that right to have ready access to a weapon. They have already proved dangerous, and having a gun available when the gigantic temper tantrum strikes may cause an escalation of issues, giving them to means, at hand, to hurt the object of their anger.

While I believe the three-strikes-you're -out concept is a bit of overkill for what could be minor infractions, I do believe people have to be held accountable for their actions. Maybe if we would hold them accountable the first time they commit a crime, they would be less likely to get to the three strikes stage of the game.

The difficulty with holding people accountable for their actions gets harder as we allow illegal aliens to flaunt our laws. We send messages whether we intend to or not, and disrespect for the law continues to grow in our country. Slapping more and more laws on will not eliminate or even slow down the problem. We need to return to our moral base, and teach our citizens that obeying the law will reap rewards while disobeying will reap consequences. Only then will we no longer have to debate about issues such as these.

Learn more about this author, Angela S. Young.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA