Home > Politics, News & Issues > International Politics > War & Terrorism
Results so far:
| Yes | 62% | 269 votes | Total: 434 votes | |
| No | 38% | 165 votes |
Yes
Created on: August 29, 2009
Al-Qaeda is a global Muslim extremist organization which is striving towards the "talibanization" of the whole world. Which means that through terrorism in the name of jihad (the Muslim Holy War) aims to put the whole world under the strictest form of the Shariah Law in the form of a Caliphate. Al Qaeda came to be known so well as it is now globally due to the bold and massive attacks using hijacked conventional passenger airplanes to crash and effectively destroy the World Trade Center Twin Towers in New York City in 9th September 2001. Since then, the United States of America, as well as the whole world in general have been making huge efforts to curtail and eradicate the terrorist activities by Al-Qaeda or its affiliates. The global anti terrorism efforts that have been enacted since that fateful attack ranges from the beefing up of the securities in the airports (for example the prohibition of sharp metal objects and liquids on board) to the US led War on Terrorism, which is still going on right now. Fast forward 8 years to the present, the big question being asked is that is Al-Qaeda getting stronger after the implementation of the aforementioned global terrorism efforts? In my opinion, I do agree to an extent that instead of getting weaker, the presence of global efforts to curtail terrorism seems to strengthen Al-Qaeda's resolve and as an organization rather than discouraging and curtailing their efforts. In the following paragraphs, we are going to delve into the various reasons why.
First and foremost, we could see that the global crackdown on terrorism, while it is being carried out in the whole world, is not really tackling the roots of the problem, which of course have been embedded so solidly to be plucked out just like that. The appropriate analogy that can be used to describe the global anti terrorism efforts is just like trying to get rid of a very huge tree just by plucking the leaves out without touching the roots which are of course much tougher to remove as they are so deeply entrenched into the soil. Even with the beefing up of the securities worldwide, captures of terrorist suspects around the world, it still does not solve the problems as the figures being captured are just those who carry out the attacks for Al-Qaeda or any other organizations affiliated to them. Just like in the game of chess, it would not do a substantial damage by just capturing the small-time pawns. These "pawns" of Al-Qaeda have little use other than overcrowding prisons such as Guantanamo Bay. Information cannot really be extracted out of them even with torture methods such as sleep deprivation and water-boarding as they are happy to die for their cause. To them, to die while on their missions is a one-way ticket to eternal happiness in heaven. Such is their mentality and loyalty that no information would be leaked out. Even if they are dead or executed globally, despite the fact that they are only the "pawns" of Al-Qaeda, the organization can quickly classify them as "martyrs" who are killed by Western Aggressors which would only serve to strengthen Al-Qaeda's morale and resolve globally. This is also compounded the fact that the big guns of the organization such as those who bankroll the organization as well as the ever-elusive Osama bin Laden are still wandering around freely out there, evading capture and also conducting attacks globally such as the 2005 London Train Bombings and the 2008 Mumbai Attacks (carried out by Laskar-e-Toiba, an al-Qaeda affiliate) .
Secondly, the points in the previous paragraph would lead to the second reason why Al-Qaeda has only become stronger despite efforts made globally to eradicate them. When the aforementioned "pawns" f Al-Qaeda are captured or killed, the organization can very easily find new, fresh, and young recruits from all over the globe. The organization has many breeding grounds globally in various forms such as religious schools/institutes that are brainwashing children with radical and twisted Islamist teachings such as a few such madrasahs in Indonesia which were found to be such institutions. Al-Qaeda is also known to operate well-equipped training grounds to groom would-be jihadists loyal to Al-Qaeda worldwide from in Afghanistan to even the strongly Catholic Philippines. Besides all these, Al-Qaeda is also utilizing a very potent tool to recruit followers worldwide and this is by using the Internet. Besides grooming children in places such as Indonesia, Afghanistan, and Pakistan, they can now reach to vulnerable Muslim youths who are born in Western countries such as the UK and the USA and many of them are well-educated. This is proven in the 2005 London Train Bombings in which the personnel involved are actually ethnic-Pakistani youths who are born and bred in the UK but radicalized by Al-Qaeda teachings through the internet. This is also true for the case of a lawyer in Singapore called Abdul Basheer who was captured and found out that he had been radicalized through the internet by Al-Qaeda and he was about to go to Afghanistan to receive trainings. This further substantiates that Al-Qaeda is gaining stronger momentum each day.
Next, we are going to delve into the primary reason why it seems to be very easy for Al-Qaeda to recruit loyal soldiers who are willing to die for their cause. The reason is simply because of the fact that Al-Qaeda is utilizing religion. All of us have known that religion is a very powerful tool in which fanaticism among its believers may override even common sense and logic. This has been historically proven from the time when the Crusaders were so inclined to capture Jerusalem at all costs in the Middle Ages to of course what happened in Denmark last year just because of a simple cartoon. It is already widely known that the primary objective of Al-Qaeda is world domination, but it would not be so easy to find such loyal recruits if they brand themselves as a nationalist or ideological movement instead of being a religious movement. With religion, it is very easy to blur the judgment of the people (even well-educated ones) by notions such as fighting for God, to die for God, and so on and so forth. Thus, it is a very intelligent as well as disturbingly dangerous for Al-Qaeda to utilize religion to edge even closer to their aims. As long as it is about religion, Al-Qaeda would not find its flames dying as there are always fanatical people out there, whether brainwashed since childhood or self radicalized through the internet, who will fight and die for Al-Qaeda despite the very many efforts to eradicate them. Another way of putting it, every time one is killed, another one thousand emerge.
Having said all those, we have to give credits to the world for the efforts made to eradicate terrorism such as Al-Qaeda, and we could very well see that those measures in place have at least yielded desirable effects such as the de-talibanization of Afghanistan as well as the annihilation of organizations affiliated to Al-Qaeda such as the recent commendable efforts by Hamas (themselves labeled as a terrorist organization by the USA) to eradicate an organization claimed to be inspired by Al-Qaeda, as well as the general beefing up of security which reduces chances of an attack happening. However, even with the measures in place, security lapses are still bound to happen such as how the Pakistani terrorists slipped through to India and to Mumbai to carry out the 2008 attacks in Mumbai as well as more recently how the two suicide bombers managed to smuggle explosives and themselves to carry out suicide bombing attacks on JW Marriott and Ritz Carlton hotels in Jakarta, Indonesia.
In conclusion, what we could draw from here is that despite the largely commendable efforts globally to counter terrorism, the unfortunate fact is that Al-Qaeda, as an organization seems to be growing stronger and stronger each day with a seemingly limitless financial power and pool of recruits ready to fight to their deaths for the cause of the organization.
Learn more about this author, Alvinbeo.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: July 16, 2007
Al Qaeda, as an organization, is actually small - no more than a few thousand fighters in any current operational theater...Al Qaeda's leadership, especially senior levels of second-tier leaders, is in constant flux because of lethal attrition inflicted by Western forces or forces friendly to the West. This leadership flux adversely impacts organizational ability to plan and execute against desired targets...While still dangerous at the tactical level, the greater, more strategic threat arises from the conflict between backward looking Islamic theory employed for self-serving reasons by a variety of social-religious-pol itical influencers, and the reality of the modern world.
On the whole, Al Qaeda's military and operational capabilities have been significantly degraded since the US and allies commenced coherent military/civil-milit ary actions against them. Only the most senior of the core organization's leadership appears to have remained intact; and although this leadership is the doctrinal and philosophical 'head of the snake' the core leadership group appears to have little direct operational control over its franchise operations in theaters beyond Afghanistan and the Duran Line region (or semi-autonomous tribal regions) of far northern Pakistan.
Al Qaeda is more a reflection of a social movement than it is a cogent fighting force. There is within the Muslim world a disconnect between Islam's life system-pervasive theology and life in the modern world. The operant philosophy within the Al Qaeda network is extreme fundamentalist Wahabi Sunni Islam; a throwback theo-philosophy which rejects modernity (because this version of Islam is incapable of compromise or evolutionary social growth) which seeks to impose Sharia Law on all other societies, i.e., because Wahabism can't adjust to any values system other than its own, other values systems must be changed to conform to with the Wahabist's values.
While the Al Qaeda movement uses elements of modern technology effectively, particularly the Internet, neither Al Qaeda, its franchised offshoot groups, other types of radicalized Sunnis and certain nationalistic sects within the Shia 'denomination' of Islam actually embrace modernism.
With the advent of satellite TV in the Middle East and Southwest Asia, the average person may now see glimpses, images, of Westernism. In some countries wherein all media are state-owned, only the most reprehensible of Western images are allowed...For example, the Iranian government, the most nationalistic and conservative of all Shiite governments in the region, regularly allows broadcast of truly vile Western pornography. The aim of these broadcasts is not to titillate but to convince Iranian viewers that the West is so wicked and corrupt that it must be brought down.
In Dubai, the United Arab Emirates (predominantly Sunni, moderately secular, and not Wahabist), more than 90% of commercials broadcast on both state-owned and privately owned television are for American-made goods...Chevy is one of the most popular automobile brands because of GM's very successful advertising campaign. Much of the programming available in Dubai is also available in Iran...the mixed images create a very confusing and puzzling image of the West for young Iranians, who comprise about 75% of the population...and some are so outraged by the licentiousness and excess they see on TV that the radical words of radicalized Mullahs have a profoundly negative impact on some young people...
While Iran and the UAE represent the ideological poles within non-Wahabist Islam, most Muslims live somewhere in the theo-philoshical middle ground...Most Muslims live poor, short lives in circumstances ranging from soul-grinding poverty to moderate affluence. Only in Saudi Arabia and the UAE do we find a pervasive affluence - and in both cases, affluence is subsidized by ruling families as a means to stave-off popular uprising against not-so-benign monarchs.
Is it any wonder, then, that millions of young Muslims are disaffected? Should we in the West be surprised that tens of thousands of young, sometimes well-educated young people raised in sub-elite families, are willing to strap a bomb to themselves to murder others? Note that not a single Saudi or UAE prince, son of a Yemeni government official, son of an Iranian Mullah or Egyptian government officer has himself taken to the homicide bomb; while many are sons (and rarely daughters) of mercantile and professionals.
My experience tells me:
- Al Qaeda is a symptom of the conflict within the Islamic world between throwback theo-philosophy and modernism;
- Emotional, intellectual and cultural confusion among literate Muslims is increasing worldwide as they gain visibility on Western culture;
- Radical conservative elements in the Islamic world, in an effort to preserve their current power, foment confusion, discontent and anger then propagandize the populace so anger at perceived inequities, their poverty and political powerlessness is directed at Western interests;
- And, that the number of true believers in the Universal Islamic Caliphate are rare, but often influential and able to radicalize significant numbers of people.
So, no, Al Qaeda isn't as strong as it was in 2001, nor has it been successful in achieving any of its goals; but the number of disaffected and radicalized Muslims has grown significantly...Whil e Al Qaeda and several of its franchise operations remain dangerous on a tactical level, the real strategic threat comes from the sheer numbers of young Muslims who have become radicalized and anti-Western because of disparity between their own life experience and the known possibilities for an alternate life system which continues to remain out of their reach.
Learn more about this author, James Coles.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.