Title endorsed in part by:
Results so far:
| Yes | 67% | 327 votes | Total: 486 votes | |
| No | 33% | 159 votes |
If bloggers and citizen journalists were given the opportunity to cover Congress, this might bring back some of the conventional coverage from days past and add some competition to the arena. Competition typically breeds quality.
The media has become predictable, biased and is not as dynamic as it used to be. Sensationalism, on some level, has replaced traditional reporting as the name of the game. Unfortunately this colors news reports with an undeniable slant. Viewers who tune in have a pretty good idea of what kinds of opinionated leaning they'll be watching.
Journalism, like most other businesses, has had to contend with the expansion of the Internet, and like other industries, technology has significantly impacted communications. Times are changing and technology is continuously evolving. As a result more people have the opportunity to share their writing skills and thoughts on different subjects. Many of them are quite talented and can be found hanging on in the various corners of the Internet doing what they do best, write.
Whether or not bloggers and citizen journalists should be able to obtain credentials is an interesting question. It seems some sort of training and education is in order, but bloggers and citizen journalists should be allowed to have the chance to obtain these credentials to cover Congressional activities. It wouldn't be difficult to establish a system where individuals interested in breaking into this field could be given the opportunity to prove their capabilities.
Since a good chunk of what's shown on the news is so slanted and biased anyway, it would be a great idea to see some fresh reporting from a new perspective thrown into the mix. Politics and reporting of political activities has become so routine; a fresh eye might be able to put what they see from pen to paper and provide the public with a fair and balanced perspective of what's really going on in the U.S. government.
Mainstream media has made it difficult to wade through the various reports, opinions, misrepresentations and fallacies to find unbiased truth. Adding some new journalism members to the pool of reporters may do the public a valuable service. It is not like the media is providing opinion-free reporting nowadays anyway, so why shouldn't individuals who are not inherently linked to a network be denied the opportunity to report on these very important issues?
True and conventional journalism has evolved significantly and while there has always been some level of bias, today most of it is opinionated and slanted; political coverage no longer provides just the facts. This is to state just anyone and everyone should start reporting, obviously the blogger or citizen journalist would have had to do some proving of oneself to illustrate they are professional, ethical and able to accurately report and write effectively, but they should definitely be given that opportunity to earn that creditability.
Individuals who are freelancing and reporting on Congressional activities won't be worried about offending advertisers or keeping their job security if they were to go against their network's political stances. Citizen journalists should be given the chance to give to the public a new perspective on what's going on in politics today.
It is clear the mainstream media isn't responsibly doing the job by sharing both sides of a situation accurately. As an interested reader, I'd support letting someone else having a chance to get the job done and report accurate and unbiased words when sharing what's going on in Congress.
Learn more about this author, Leigh Goessl.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
As a blogger, a journalist trying to break into a major daily, and someone who has a masters of journalism, I really think that allowing bloggers/citizen journalists credentials to big events or press conferences would inhibit the functionality of the events for everyone involved.
Journalists who are in media scrums are like a pack of wolves, we fight and bicker over scraps(quotes, facts, etc) but we all more or less move in the same general direction for the same purpose. This allows us to get the most possible information in a short amount of time from the people we need access to. This is the essence of reportage, time management.
Allowing in someone who is untrained in interview methodology and etiquette within a news collecting situation hurts everyone involved, and in turn hurts the product and the reader is less informed overall. Bloggers don't have to worry about an editor who wants specific things asked. One out of left field question can kill a media scrum or press conference and someone untrained and unseasoned really would not have the expertise to do this.
What people fail to really see is that many bloggers take none of the journalistic rigors of someone who must put there work through an editorial process every day. With that said, I disagree with the editorial process and would love to have the freedom of a blogger when doing real journalism.
I really don't see why a blogger would ever need to go to a press conference. Most bloggers or mainstream journalists who are worth a damn don't break news from a press conference or an event. Good journalism comes from getting your hands dirty and I don't mean from dough nut frosting on the media buffet table. It actually seems antithetical to what blogging is supposed to be about...street level guerrilla journalism, not press boxes and continental breakfasts.
If you want to be the press, go to J School, then get a job and hump a beat for a few years and earn the privilege of covering events as the press. If you want to be a journalist as a hobby, blog it up, but you don't deserve to be treated as journalist because to be honest you have not paid any dues.
Learn more about this author, Nicholas Nedin.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.