No

• 1 of 10

  by Mark Luedtke

  Created on: June 20, 2008

  The argument for farm subsidies is they help small, family farmers stay in business. That's a silly

• 2 of 10

  by Jonathan Young

  Created on: November 23, 2007   Last Updated: February 07, 2009

  U.S. farm subsidies were once intended to help farmers ride out variations in their markets. Since then,

• 3 of 10

  by Charles Ray

  Created on: April 18, 2009

  It is long past time to recognize the fact - the small, family farm that forms the basis of the image

• 4 of 10

  by Clark Lester

  Created on: January 12, 2008

  I think the farm subsidy program is in need of some serious reform. Let me tell you why-

  U.S. farm subsidy

• 5 of 10

  by Fred Tolleson

  Created on: June 20, 2008

  American farmers do not need to continue to receive government subsidies. The original idea behind farm

• 6 of 10

  by J. Lee Kenser

  Created on: January 10, 2008

  I believe No but, you have to consider what are they getting the subsidy for? How much is it and are

• 7 of 10

  by Michael Greaney

  Created on: January 15, 2008

  Government subsidies of any kind are ultimately based on the assumption that people can't make the best

• 8 of 10

  by Timothy Moreland

  Created on: February 15, 2008   Last Updated: December 02, 2010

  Using Mike Huckabee's reasons for farm subsidies, I will argue against them.

  1. We must be able to feed

• 9 of 10

  by Jobie Weetaluktuk

  Created on: July 06, 2007

  I am not an American, so I'd have to say no. I'm a Canadian, so I'd have to say double no. No and no.

• 10 of 10

  by Richard Harty

  Created on: July 07, 2007

  There are "farmers" that buy up land here in California just because they can get subsidies to NOT grow