Autos >
Fuel Economy
Get a Widget for this title
RSS FeedShould governments give tax credits for alternative fuel vehicles?
Results so far:
| Yes | 74% | 408 votes | Total: 548 votes | |
| No | 26% | 140 votes |
Yes
Write now
Print
Invite a writer™
Add to FavoritesGiving tax credits for alternative fuel vehicles has many benefits. It will create a greater demand for vehicles, which will minimize the use of fossil fuels. It will stimulate investment of research and development of new vehicles, which can lead to the creation of tens of thousands of jobs. It will result in a cleaner environment for succeeding generations.
There are several types of alternative fuel vehicles which will create less pollution and diminish our need for fossil fuels. Fossil fuels are largely provided by nations with agendas that often conflict with those of many other nations.
Plug-in hybrid technology has rapidly progressed over the past decade. These vehicles still have small internal combustion engines, but can have a range of over one hundred miles. These hybrids are being produced in small numbers by companies such as Fisker and Tesla Motors.
Hydrogen fuel cell powered cars have been developed by Honda, but it will take years to develop a network of fueling stations. Many cars can run on either ethanol, or biodiesel. Biodiesel can be generated from many sources such as; used cooking oil, corn, sugar cane, switch grass, and even garbage. In fact, Brazil has developed complete energy independence by developing their own ethanol and biodiesel fuels.
Stimulating research and development in the design and production of alternative fuel vehicles can result in the creation of many jobs. Production of alternative fuels will require many workers, as will the manufacture of these new vehicles. It is hoped that the Chevrolet Volt, a new plug-in hybrid vehicle, could help save General Motors from bankruptcy. Even more jobs will be created by developing new sales and marketing networks for these vehicles.
Finally, these vehicles create far less pollution than the gasoline and diesel powered vehicles that are currently available. The cleanest are the hydrogen fuel cell types, which only give off water vapor through its exhaust pipes. This will greatly reduce air pollution and greenhouse gases, which contribute to global warming. Catastrophic climate events have been predicted to occur before the end of this century by the majority of the scientific community.
Many consumers will buy these vehicles with the incentive of tax credits. Many will buy them because they are cleaner and won't require the use of costly fossil fuels. If tax credits do increase demand, then automakers will invest in new technologies which could make such vehicles more efficient, and less costly. The world will benefit as a result.
Learn more about this author, Leslie Schwab.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Tax Credits are not the proper way to go green or encourage sustainable energy conservation, any more than cheap gas and easy credit were good reasons for so many to buy and drive wasteful SUV's in the recent past. Tax credits can be one of several negative contributors which artificially skew the free market, and result in vehicles being tooled and manufactured for the wrong reasons. If a technology is viable, it will be introduced, survive and thrive. If the business case in a free market economy is based on bribing the consumer, then it is not a good idea.
Based upon my research, when a technology is introduced and marketed based upon tax credits and other artificial acts, the business model normally is based upon some manipulation of the decision-makers by investors or groups who profit not from the long-term viability of the technology but from the short-term tax breaks and financial distortions that result from these actions.
The most recent corn-for-fuel experiment is a perfect example of how lobbyists and investors with only financial interests can profit from the well-intentioned but over-emotional actions of the consumer. Higher food prices and a number of other backlash effects have been felt, while the reality is that the fuel costs more and delivers less energy than regular gasoline, while in no way showing the ability to justify the dedicated investment to the artificially created enterprise. The auto manufacturers benefit artificially, in that they are allowed to claim tax breaks for manufacturing these flex fuel vehicles, while only a very small percentage of buyers ever even try the fuel. Additionally, most of those who do soon realize that their mileage per dollar is lower, and quickly migrate back to conventional fuels.
I can find no proposal for these tax-credit enhanced proposals which is built upon a business case which, without these breaks, would stand alone as a viable technology or investment. There are so many alternatives under development that the choice to force a select few into favor represents a huge gamble that without free-market competition we are selecting the correct ones.
At the turn of the twentieth century, many electric cars were manufactured in addition to the steam-powered versions. The free market decided which direction to take based upon a number of factors involving consumer value and convenience. These same factors should drive the technologies and alternative energy developments today. If the sheer existence of a new powertrain is justified by tax breaks in one country, what is the global market for this product? The ability to leverage economies of scale and participate in global competition is over-ruled by the greed of the financiers who make money whether the technology survives a few years or is in fact the correct long-term choice.
Learn more about this author, xe.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Difference of opinion? Debate now.
- Fuel Economy
- Does ethanol-blended gasoline truly help your fuel economy?
- Should US car manufacturers be required to increase the fuel economy of the vehicles they produce?
- Are high fuel prices necessary?
- Should corn ethanol requirements be abandoned considering world hunger?
- Is regular-grade gasoline just as good as premium gas for your car?
- Will higher gasoline prices mean lower sales for new cars?
