Too old

• 1 of 23

  by Hector Castro

  Created on: July 19, 2010

  There is no doubt that there are certain rock superstars who have timeless music.  Unfortunately,

• 2 of 23

  by Roger Kraemer

  Created on: May 20, 2008

  "Too old to rock and roll, too young to die." Jethro Tull said it best in a song title, and now it describes

• 3 of 23

  by Ladybusker

  Created on: February 16, 2008

  Wrinkles, crinkles, tight pants and once sensual lips that now resemble a lizard's!

  The problem here

• 4 of 23

  by Barbara Stanley

  Created on: May 30, 2009

  Mick Jagger, bless his heart, could never be found guilty of being handsome. Fine wine might get better

• 5 of 23

  by Joseph Whalen

  Created on: February 21, 2008

  While their music may be timeless their bodies and their ability to perform clearly is not. There comes

• 6 of 23

  by Anthony Perlingos

  Created on: November 15, 2009

  Being a child in the 1960s I was very fortunate to witness firsthand the cultural revolution that was

• 7 of 23

  by Neil Graham Marsden

  Created on: March 06, 2008

  Dedicated to Jazz & Blues musician Alan George Heywood Melly (August 1926 - July 2007)

  The Cruel effects

• 8 of 23

  by Ira Faro

  Created on: October 25, 2009

  
  

  ROCK AIN'T THE BLUES

  The question answers itself, although McCartney and the Stones are slightly different

• 9 of 23

  by D K Mitchell

  Created on: May 08, 2009

  Somewhere back in the fifties rock and roll was born. As my own birth wasn't until nineteen sixty

• 10 of 23

  by Ethel Smith

  Created on: January 18, 2008

  Now come on they are too old.

  As a woman in my mid fifties I adored such bands as the Rolling Stones

• 11 of 23

  by J. Favreau

  Created on: June 11, 2008

  I think that the generation of Paul McCartney and Rolling Stones are too old to rock. I do not agree

• 12 of 23

  by Harry Lacey

  Created on: November 20, 2007

  In my mind, this debate shouldn't simply revolve around whether the artists mentioned can still hack

• 13 of 23

  by Gillian Taber

  Created on: July 21, 2008

  We're not supposed to say it, are we? In these days of equality for everyone and being so P.C. that

• 14 of 23

  by Peggy Molloy

  Created on: September 22, 2007   Last Updated: January 03, 2011

  I came of age when the Rolling Stones and Paul McCartney were in their prime. In truth, most of what

• 15 of 23

  by J. Lee Kenser

  Created on: October 20, 2007

  Definitely, too old. Their new albums are not selling like they used to. They feel more like they are

• 16 of 23

  by Travis Herndon

  Created on: December 12, 2008   Last Updated: December 28, 2008

  There is nothing sexier than watching a 60 year old Mick Jagger thrust his pelvis all over the stage

• 17 of 23

  by Thaxton Lewis

  Created on: March 08, 2008

  Paul McCartney and the Rolling Stones are too old and too rich to rock out or produce the kind of raw

• 18 of 23

  by Sean Curtis

  Created on: February 21, 2008

  First of all, I think the Stones, McCartney, and the other aging rock stars have every right to continue

• 19 of 23

  by Johnny Blonde

  Created on: October 12, 2007

  Recently there has been a surge of acts reforming for one reason and another. We always dream that our

• 20 of 23

  by Daniel Mallon

  Created on: June 10, 2008

  I don't for a second believe there's an easy answer to this question, for starters, Paul McCartney's