Home > Society & Lifestyle > Ethnicity & Gender > Gender Issues
Results so far:
| No | 29% | 568 votes | Total: 1940 votes | |
| Yes | 71% | 1372 votes |
No
Created on: November 01, 2010
A good question, if ever there was one. BUT.......fat chance of any kind of objective answer. A few of us observant types, and by "observant types" I mean the few folks who actually WATCH, LISTEN, and OBSERVE before making a decision (while most just tow the media and PC police party line), have noticed a strange, and universally ignored, but very unappealing phenomena. Said phenomena being the popular conception of the American male as some sort of half-retarded boy-child, incapable of even a simple task.....were it not for the noble, and saintly woman, the American male archtype wouldn't even be able to make it out of bed....right? So....is this too harsh an indightment?
Maybe, maybe not. But any person, male or female has seen such great shows like "Everybody loves Raymond, King of Queens, Family Matters, The World According to Jim" and dozens more. The one thing these shows have in common is the lovable, but clueless man, who consistantly lies to, dissapoints, ignores his wife/girlfriend/mate. And the all-knowing, all-forgiving woman always shows him the error of his ways.....and we all laugh and say "that's soooooo true!" right? Gosh, I don't see too many shows that don't cast a man as an emotionaly stunted, irresponsible buffoon. I don't see too many shows portraying men as breaking their backs every day to provide for their loved ones. Don't see too many shows about men working themselves to an early grave to provide for their families. But THAT is closer to the truth than the pop-culture stereotype that is jammed down our throats on a regular basis.
Ladies.......WE GET IT.....you struggled for a few generations to get an equal say, and that is admirable, but let's not go overboard, and make man-bashing the accepted, and lauded pasttime it is today.
There are myriad books, texts, etc... out there today, trying to teach some sort of inter-gender understanding right? We've all seen them, most of you ladies have read more than one. They all espouse the same doctrine: Women, are divine, forgiving, understanding, infinitly complex creatures, and it is incumbent upon a man, to understand, to relate, to empathize with a woman's emotional patterns. That will bring you closer to your mate, and make you a better man....right? So....Uhhhhhh where are the books that tell women that empathy is a 2-way thing, and maybe they should try to understand their men? Yeah, those books are few and far between.
This nation has shifted it's paradigm of schism......it hasn't beat discrimination, it just found a new bad guy. Generations past viewed women as silly and irrelevant, over-emotional and generally incapable. Well, we outgrew that notion. But instead of viewing man and women as equal citizens, we, as a culture, turned our rancor on men. This society does everything it can to de-masculinize men. New, and unproven idiot psychologists create new models for child-raising, specifically targeted at young boys, teaching them to behave like little girls, not competitive, goal-driven men. The result is generations of young men with NO role models, NO idea how to behave, and ZERO chance at sucess, when they enter the dog-eat-dog, no holds barred world of the old men that run this nation. Who will take their place? Women? Sure, there is room for women at the top, but we shouldn't rig the game in their favor, because they were not allowed to vote a hundred years ago. The best we can do is give women an honest chance to suceed, to live their dreams. We should not hand them the keys to the kingdom out of some misplaced sense of generational guilt. And we should raise our boys to be men, not feminized girl-slaves, forever apologizing for the ignorance and bigotry of men that aren't even alive anymore.
So whom does society favor? What is the evidence? Is it fair to say women are still second class citizens, when every beacon, every cultural indicator tells us otherwise? Must we shackle young men to the sins of bygone generations, and never allow them to reach their potential as men while women have all of the breaks? How much is enough? When does PC politics break from reality, and become a hinderance? Good questions huh? Do you think you can honestly answer them? Or will you watch those sitcoms......as they insidiously program you to stop taking the American man seriously, and laugh and say "Thats so true!"?
Learn more about this author, Adam Mcculley.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Yes
Created on: July 06, 2010 Last Updated: July 12, 2011
Attitudes, traditions, customs and much lip-service has been given to promote manhood and to denigrate that of women. Disfavor towards women has been reflected throughout the annals of history; reflected in the age-old fairy tale of the knight in shining armor, come to rescue the damsel in distress, whisking her away, to live happily forever after.
Principle of the "First Born":
Traditionally, males have always been favored as the "first-born", especially by fathers. In Western society, excuse is given one cannot play ball or do all those masculine activities with a girl, as can be between father and son. A male is desired to carry on the family name, to create an immortal lineage, much to the distress of a female offspring. Of course, that has given way to a more relaxed attitude concerning wanting a boy offspring first, feminism has brought about some changes in social mores.
This favoring of males is very much demonstrated by Asian societies, especially China. Daughters are looked upon as encumbrances and a liability to the family organization because they are not considered bread-earners and contribute little to family survival. Often abandoned or sold off to richer families, this love of male has come back to haunt them. In China, because all parents have chosen to have a boy first, this priority has resulted in very few females to go around when it is now time for these males to marry.
Women as Chattel:
Women cannot be favored when they are demeaned at home and have all human rights taken away from them. Arranged marriages still exist in many countries and have interfered with female freedom. Historically, dowries were created to entice suitors to take a daughter off a father's hands. Upon marriage, women often had to relinquish property previously inherited to the husband. Does that sound like favoritism to you?
Previously, Native Indian women could not own property. If she did, it was automatically her husband's upon marriage. Should an Indian woman wish to leave the tribe or reservation, she automatically lost claim to any property she had. Of course, if she should marry outside her race, her possessions were immediately confiscated.
As for East Indian women, the tradition of being burned with her deceased husband on a funeral pyre states she is not a person without the presence of her husband. Still, isolated cases have been reported in remote parts of India where this custom is still practiced.
Women as Sex Objects/Objects of Abuse:
The atrocity of Muslim women being made to wear burqas showing only their eyes is a bold assumption that females are so hated in their society, they must be treated as objects and property of men. They are such an abomination to men, everything must be covered. They are not allowed in public unless accompanied by a male of the family. That is blatant and flagrant disrespect towards women. Now the controversy in France of voting burqas being worn in public places by Muslim women, with education for the women, and fines for their husbands should they break or disregard this law.
From female prostitution to human trafficking; women as sex objects and sex slaves stoke a prevalent criminality. In strict male sense, women are often seen as sex objects decorating a harem, concubines for great men, mistresses of married men, and harlots with lovers. This portrayal or lowly depiction certainly harbors no favoritism towards their gender.
In Chinese society, there was a time when being a widow held its own stigma. Widows were looked upon as "used" women, and remarrying was taboo. We've come a long way since then.
Exclusivity of Clubs/Sports/Armed Forces:
Male domains have long ostracized and kept women from joining. With mentality of the "Old Boys Club" still holding, women cannot join the Freemasons without their husbands nor can women be in the United States Infantry to fight along their counterparts. Congress has passed a law forbidding this.
Certain sports still remain a male domain. Even when women break out to form their own teams, they are ridiculed and laughed at for their venture forward. Only strong exceptions of the female athlete are able to break through the confines of sports like hockey, baseball, race car driving, etc.
Ascension to the Throne:
Women are not favored when it comes to the question of leadership. Men have always been at the top of the totem pole when it comes to the monarchy. In spite of conspiracies to keep women away from the throne, the gentler sex have managed to climb their way to the top by either killing, poisoning, or becoming regents in order to gain power to an elusive throne. Since lineage always fell to the males first for ascension to the throne; Queen Elizabeth II of England managed to thwart a pecking order when her uncle abdicated and married American divorcee, Mrs. Wallace Simpson.
As free-thinking as she is, America has yet to elect her first female president while other countries have forged ahead decades ago. Now, the last bastion of "maleness", Australia has elected their first female Prime Minister. Kudos to Australia!
Feminist Movement and Pay Equity:
Men are favored in society when women's value and worth is not measured by their pay checks. The sixties and seventies saw a feminist movement which chanted "Equal pay for equal work." Now that both partners in a marriage are major breadwinners, men continue to earn just a little bit more than women. Conditions for equal parity have improved, but it still remains that if women want recognition and favor from society, she must prove herself twice as worthy, and must do everything to supersede the efforts of men.
Learn more about this author, Ann Major.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.