Join | Log in

Channel Button
Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

Government & Policies

Get a Widget for this title

Does the resale of Coast Guard Marine cutters by faith-based groups signal a problem for faith-based initiatives?

Results so far:

Yes
58% 7 votes Total: 12 votes
No
42% 5 votes
Yes

Americans who are familiar with the historical abuses of governance by various faiths in Europe and Great Britain, during the centuries prior to our Revolution, are firmly opposed to any direct Federal support of religion. The vast majority of United States voters who participated in ratifying our current Constitution in 1789, as well as the Bill of Rights shortly thereafter, were quite firm about separating government from religion, and vice-versa. Their reasoning was based on fact: horrific abuses and sins committed by religious leaders who simultaneously held the reigns of government and wielded the authority of law.
The Salem Witch Trials had occurred not long before. Countless women were publicly murdered in God's name, after trials that were a vile apostasy. The Spanish Inquisition was still active in Europe, and had been for hundreds of years. Too many people of faith these days are blissfully ignorant of how Church Leaders and Royalty used the fatuous claim of Divine Right to murder, torture, imprison, beat, starve and humiliate anyone for sectarian reasons, regardless of innocence or guilt. Centuries of faith-based warfare ravaged Europe and England, squandering the flower of their young manhood for numerous generations. Every single one of God's Commandments were broken, in God's name, by church leaders who were drunk with power and insanely driven to make their own faith The One True Faith.
We don't do that kind of stuff in the United States of America. History is littered wall-to-wall with the corpses of religion's innocent victims, which is why this nation's founding citizens led the entire western world back to morality and sanity when they ratified a Constitution that keeps religion out of government, and prevents government from favoring one faith over any other.
A gift of tax-bought assets to an already tax-exempt religious group is a slap in the face to every person who wants to practice their beliefs in absolute freedom from persecution. It's a dangerous step down a slippery slope that history has long since proved to be a fall from grace.
Organized Religion already receives considerable largess from governments local and federal: no locality may assess property taxes on church, temple, synagogue or other lands owned by a congregation and used for the purpose of freely practicing their faith; charitable donations to religious organizations are fully tax deductible for the donor. Americans are a predominantly religious people - atheists have always been around, but still number in tiny minority. We accept this loss of billions in tax dollars yearly for many reasons, not least of which is the fact that these tax breaks are available uniformly to all faiths, not just one or a chosen few.
Giving away Coast Guard Cutters to members of some faith who can't seem to raise enough money elsewhere is indeed a warning semaphore to all who want government and religion to operate freely in their own separate spheres, and without subsidizing each other.

Learn more about this author, Robert Crouch.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

Why should this indicate a problem? Prior to including faith based groups able to apply and receive government assistance supporting their endeavors, non-faith based groups and individuals were taking advantage as they could of any and all government programs. More often than not the prize was a grant, or straight cash, other times, access to surplus items for reduced or no cost. Once an individual or group was granted some piece of a given pie, they did whatever it is they do, with some additional asset in support. So, just because the government now feels it can allow faith-based organizations to apply for and win some grant or other item that supports their cause, typically helping homeless, providing counseling, whatever, just like any other group, they are free to use what they have been given/granted as they see fit. The government has some amount of watchdog process on any group that receives some form of government assistance, and that is still the case with faith-based groups as well. I do not know how rigorous their oversight is, probably not nearly enough but that is not the question. In any case, when the government decides their is common good that can be accomplished and it is reasonably able to further that good with taxpayer money/assets, it sets up grants and such which must be applied for and won. The list of available assistance is extremely large as well. Why any person or group should be excluded from attempting to get some piece of the pie that will further their goals as well as participate in what the government think is worthwhile, doesn't make sense with the exception of groups/individuals who have previously been found to have abused the system. Other than that, the government, like it makes businesses and other entities, should not discriminate based on race/creed/color/sex /whatever when handing out items/assets it has decided to fund.

Learn more about this author, Koosmar.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA