Search Helium

Home > Personal Finance > Insurance > Insurance (Other)

Should insurance companies be required to inform customers their premium is affected by their credit score?

Results so far:

Yes
92% 581 votes Total: 630 votes
No
8% 49 votes

Yes

by Wayne Leon Learmond

Created on: August 24, 2011

This has to be ‘standard, in that all insurance companies should make it absolutely clear about their terms and conditions. Transparency should be the byword for all insurance companies who offer their services to the general public.  Insurance companies should make it known to customers that their credit score will be adversely affected if they are late in paying their bills, such as credit cards, mortgages and higher purchase payments. 

A potential customer will be able to obtain insurance if their credit score is affected - negatively. However, their premiums will be much higher than normal. In other words, depending upon their credt score, depends upon whether or not their premiums will be set to a high rate.  Insurance companies should make it absolutely clear within their policies, that customers - or potential customers premiums will be affected by their bad credit score.  

All too often insurance companies leave customers in the lurch, by not making it clear to their customers what they are covered for. But this cover can be affected by how often, or how little you pay your bills on time. However, it is not just in credit scoring that insurance companies should inform their potenital customers that they will not be accepted.  They should also inform them that their policy will be ineffective following certain natural disasters too.

For too long insurance companies have been able to literally get away with murder by making certain terms and conditions nigh on impossible to understand. This in turn confuses the public who, in many cases, do not even read the full terms and conditions because they are simply too hard to make out.  It seems that if a reasonable claim is made, then insurance companies complicate things. Again, it seems that many make up the rules as they go along. They always seem to find some way of not paying out, when a certain event arises.

The thing is this, when signing a contract with an insurance company, do you really know what you are getting? The fact is, the smaller the print, the less likely you are to read it. Insurance companies know this, and they play on it - to the detriment of you - the policy holder.

For example, the volcanic eruption that took place in Iceland, not so long ago, leaving thousands stranded at airports - or missing their holiday completely - is a case in point. People suddenly realised that their travel insurance policies were absolutely useless.  All the money that they had been paying out toward their travel insurance costs, counted for nothing. Travel insurance companies made excuse after excuse, in order not to pay out what would have amounted to millions of dollars, euros, and pounds.

Furious policy holders were left seething with rage, as their insurance companies simply refused to compensate them for lost holidays. With many insurance companies, their policies simply did not account for volcanic eruptions. It seemed that volcanic eruptions were not on the list of ‘natural disasters’ - as would be an earthquake, tidal wave or hurricane.

With certain governments making the decision to close certain airports, this too was not ‘covered’ by insurance companies. This meant that people were left, uncompensated, furious and stranded, their holidays ruined by the excuses that travel insurance companies came up with.

Countless thousands of policy holders, were left confused and bemused as to why their insurance companies were not paying out. The standard line being that customers 'should have read the small print’. Yet, insurance companies should be there to cover the ‘unexpected’ - especially in this day and age of natural disasters. Yet, there is an awful lot of small print that insurance companies use that simply confuse and befuddle customers.

Insurance companies, should cover for earthquakes, riots, floods, volcanic eruptions, and the rest. In this ever-changing world of ours, a world of upheaval and natural disasters, travel insurance companies must make it absolutely clear that such events WILL be covered within their policies. Their customer service, when a natural disaster such as the Icelandic volcano eruption occurs, leaves a lot to be desired - and left thousands of their customers seething with rage and confusion due to their stance on payouts.

There is simply not enough clarity, and common sense when travel insurance companies write up their policies. What customers find, instead, is nothing but excuse after excuse from insurance companies not willing to ’pay out’ when a major incident occurs. Indeed, travel insurance companies are quick to take our money, quick to raise premiums if our credit is bad, but not so quick in paying out when we, the customer, needs it the most. 

The rule to any potential customer who is thinking about taking out a policy, is to check the small print. Read the policy from beginning to end and see if it covers ‘all the bases’. Does it cover for riots, strikes by airport staff, floods, earthquakes or volcanic eruptions?  Does it cover for unexpected death in the family, or unexpected health problems with yourself? And also will your insurance company take you on if you have a bad credit score, and if so how high will your premiums be if you do have 'bad credit'?  Go through everything, and then decide whether or not that policy, and that company, will be the one you go with. 

It is only by reading everything within the policy, that you will save yourself a major problem when it comes to insurance companies paying out. And if you are thinking about taking on an insurance then you must make sure that everything is above board - in reference to your credit scoring. 

If your credit is affected insurance companies will take you on as a customer, but your premiums will be higher. However, in order for the customer to know this, insurance companies - as explained earlier within this article - should make it absolutely clear that this is the case, within their policy rules.

However, insurance companies very rarely make themselves understood to the 'layman' and woman, and much confusion among customers in trying to read polcies that are - quite frankly - impossible to understand, happens daily. Again, as explained above, insurance companies seem to hide everything within the small print. This is because they know that people will not bother reading the small print of a policy and so will sign on the dotted line, not realising what they are really signing for, and how high their premiums will be if they have bad credit.  

Too many times things are buried/hidden, deep within the 'small print' of a policy, making it nigh on impossible to read, let alone understand.  Insurance companies must break out of this habit, and make clear their policies to all of their customers. and potential customers.

Learn more about this author, Wayne Leon Learmond.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

by Garrett Anderson

Created on: July 02, 2009

Insurance companies should not have to disclose your credit score because quite simply, they should not have access to your credit to begin with. We are not asking for credit when we buy insurance. But why stop at just a credit score? Maybe insurance companies should lobby lawmakers for a complete family history, a psychological test or two, and throw in a polygraph test for good measure. There are very few things that I detest more than the insurance industry.

Perhaps investors should have access to publicly traded companies, like American International Group, and prior to buying any stock in a publicly traded insurance company the company directors should be made to furnish and disclose their own credit histories and worthiness. Bank directors should have to furnish their credit histories before customers deposit money in their banks. You want full disclosure from us? How about letting consumers start prying into the business executives personal lives, discovering how many homes they have, how much they make, if they pay bills on time, or whether they use company jets for little vacations to unwind from all that hard work?

I find it absolutely fascinating that an industry can compel you to buy their product, indeed passing laws that require it, and then use every excuse imaginable to squeeze more money out of you. It is equally fascinating that people accept this. You have a certain breed of dog, Mr. Jones. Oh sorry, we rate your homeowners higher. You have the V-8 in your car Mr. Smith, we charge more for that. Our studies show (our- being the operative word) that you will be one fraction of a percent more likely to get in an accident than someone with a V-6 engine. We will have to charge you more. Oh your credit score? We can interpret that anyway we want and rest assured that we will find some ridiculous reason to rate you higher.

Insurance companies manage to pass laws that reduce their exposure to risk. You see, they are risk managers. Reducing risks means more money to them. So they lobby intensively for laws that force you to wear seat belts, helmets, hardhats, or any other device they believe will reduce or minimize their losses. They are very adept at conspiring with lawmakers over cocktails to pass legislation in the name of safety when in actuality they could care less. It's all about the money. They fight no fault insurance tooth and nail.

If in fact you ever do make a claim, then you get to don your headgear and do battle with adjusters. Their sole purpose in life is to reduce the insurance companies risk once you make a claim and settle on some partial and ridiculous amount. Sign away your right to sue them. Everything is "hunky dory" as long as you send in those premium checks. Once you make a claim that all changes. In places like New Orleans and S.Florida, homeowners pay through the teeth for property and casualty coverage. I know one homeowner paying 900 a month on a 200,000 dollar home in New Orleans. More than the cost of her mortgage.

Oh and the excuses insurance companies make. Trying to cap awards and settlements. The problem is that lawmakers, a huge proportion of which happen to be lawyers, don't fall for that rhetoric. Insurance companies can't whisper some safety sales pitch in the lawmakers ears. They don't want to hear it because just as insurance companies suffer from greed, so too do those lawyers making laws. Insurance companies like blaming insurance losses on fraud. Of course. Everyone suffers from theft. It is a cost of doing business and yet I see very little in the way of insurance fraud investigators actually working with police departments in a routine way. Once in awhile they show up in some isolated fraud incident that is exposing them to tremendous loss. More often than not, they simply use adjusters to nickel and dime mom and pop when they finally make a claim. Maybe cancel their insurance after wards.

I cannot tell you how many hundreds of thousands of dollars of mine have found their way into health insurance, title insurance, car and vehicle insurance, life insurance, property and casualty insurance, disability insurance, or any number of other insurance products. Absolutely outrageous and astronomical costs of malpractice insurance. There is no way to calculate the cost. My personal claims have amounted to very little of that cost. How do you calculate the cost of an individual's taxes paying for the 180 billion dollar bailout of A.I.G.?

Here's the bottom line. The insurance business has overstepped it's boundaries. They sell a product. They are a monopoly, and although they have a few different names, they all play the same game. They use information that has no bearing on whether you pay for your product and get coverage in return. They use your own information against you. Insurance companies have no more business ordering a credit report on you than your electric utility, your phone company, your dog groomer, or your grocer. If you pay your bill, that's all that counts. I don't want their prying eyes in my personal life, I don't want them impinging on my personal liberty by plying lawmakers with cocktails, and I don't want their silly and self serving statistics which are a broad generalization and have very little to do with any given individual.

My insurance premiums have never gone down. After all those safety advances, crusades on drunk driving, and every other conceivable law that benefits insurance companies and saved countless lives, not once in 35 years have I reaped a financial benefit. Using a credit score is just one additional method to justify stealing more dollars from their "customers." I can't wait for the day that insurance companies start administering psychological tests and polygraphs. If they could figure out a way, trust me they would.

Learn more about this author, Garrett Anderson.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA