Home > Business > Advertising & Marketing > Advertising
Results so far:
| Yes | 63% | 1064 votes | Total: 1683 votes | |
| No | 37% | 619 votes |
Yes
Created on: July 02, 2007 Last Updated: February 28, 2011
We all know sex sells, and attractive women have been seen draped, scantily clad over vehicles for sale for as long as we can remember when it comes to advertising. But what exactly is the message being sent by such adverts?
The combination of attractive women and goods for sale implies that making a purchase will attract the type of women seen in the adverts to the buyer and make them irresistible.
No matter what adverts are supposed to be suggesting, a logical person viewing them really knows better. A man knows that a car may make an attractive woman glance his way, but that she will be looking at the car and not at him. We all know that purchasing an object will not ultimately increase our desirability, and that having a sexy woman pictured in an advert for a product doesn't necessarily make the product great.
We know all of this and yet adverts are still being churned out sending subconscious messages to viewers that women are objects, to be admired for their physical attributes and little else. There is nothing wrong with women being seen to be attractive, but it is the lack of balance in adverts which may be viewed as worrisome..
Society is aware that repeatedly viewing images makes us remember them more. Are women then, only to be remembered as fashion accessories with no mention of brains or feelings involved?
It is not only men who view adverts with women being used to sell products, but other women too. They look at adverts of perfectly airbrushed women and compare themselves to them, and lose self esteem in the process.
Many young women are striving to be like those pictured in adverts, as they perceive that society wants women to look this way. Some women not only experience a dip in self esteem, but end up with an eating disorder in an attempt to be slim like models in adverts.
Another point that annoys many women about adverts is that they are so unintelligent. They may be thought of as only being on walls in garages where men ogle them, but actually they are in women's magazines, and on bill boards and the television too.
If a product is good and worth having surely it should be able to sell on its own merits, without having to have a near naked women pictured with it.
Learn more about this author, Bridget Webber.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Created on: July 12, 2007
The problem with the argument that advertisements using sex to sell products degrades women is that these women willingly participate in the creation of these ads for large sums of money. If anything, it is women using sexuality to exploit those who would pay them for their poses. We are no longer in an era where women have few choices in what to do with their lives. And women, smarter than ever, have learned that their bodies are money-generating machines which can easily draw much larger paychecks than most other jobs.
The modeling industry is one of the few where women can easily make much more money than men. Women consciously choose to participate in these photo shoots; if a particular woman believes that she is degraded when she sees such ads, then it is her right and prerogative to voice that opinion to those women who choose to engage in such professions. While the use of good looks to achieve financial stability might be an unpalatable way to earn a living to some people, it does not degrade. If the modeling agencies and the photographers and advertisers purchasing the photos and video of these women were not paying them to do their job, or were exploiting them with lower wages than men, then the case could be made that sexuality degrades women.
What we forget to realize, however, is that the women participating in these advertisements embrace and celebrate sexuality, both the general concept and their own individualized reality. By focusing on such a silly notion of degradation, we fail to focus on real instances of female degradation in the workplace. The case of Lilly Ledbetter, who recently lost her Supreme Court decision against Goodyear Tire and Rubber for years of inequality in pay versus the compensation of men performing the same role, does more to degrade the struggle of women to attain equal rights in the nation than does any seductive advertisement. When we focus on the Hollywood culture more than real injustices, we only degrade further.
It is high time that we spend more resources on combatting injustices such as the inequal pay of men and women at executive levels of Fortune 500 corporations, and fewer resources on Judeo-Christian moral outrage and Puritanical ideas of sexuality. Only once we spend more time scrutinizing business practices toward women and less time criticizing women who choose to make a financially-sound career move will we take real steps toward ending the degradation of women in the United States.
Learn more about this author, Zach Bigalke.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.