Join | Log in

Channel Button
Debate_icon

Entertainment   >

Movie Characters & Performances

Get a Widget for this title

Who would win in a lightsaber duel: Darth Vader or Darth Maul?

Results so far:

Lord Vader
75% 515 votes Total: 684 votes
Darth Maul
25% 169 votes
Lord Vader

Darth Vader and Darth Maul are two of the most menacing Sith characters in the Star Wars Universe. One a sheer weapon fueled by hatred, the other a fallen Jedi who succumbed to the dark side of the Force. While both characters are extremely skilled, Darth Vader would be the clear winner versus Darth Maul.

If the history of both characters is examined, they have many similarities. As Sith Lords, Darth Maul and Darth Vader shared a hatred for the Jedi and showed no mercy towards their captives or victims. Eager to follow the will of their master, Darth Sidious, they both executed orders without question. The two of them proved to be well trained in the Force and lightsaber combat, which meant certain defeat (or worse) for their opponents.

However, they also have many differences - differences that give Darth Vader the edge if a confrontation was to occur.

First, Darth Maul was a trained assassin. His only knowledge of the Jedi was that they were to be eradicated by any means necessary. Darth Vader WAS a former Jedi. As Anakin Skywalker, he was trained in the ways of the light side of the Force. Vader was a former General as well (having fought in the Clone Wars), so he also had the edge in strategy and cunning. Although he no longer embraced the Jedi philosophy, these factors had to give him an edge as a Sith. The many battles he fought before and after the Clone Wars made him battle tested for any number of opponents - including another Sith. Any mind games or "cloak and dagger" confrontations would surely put Lord Maul at a decided disadvantage.

Secondl y, Darth Vader had endured many lightsaber battles against both Jedi and Sith. Darth Maul had not faced a large number of opponents that used both sides of the force. On many occasions, Vader (as Anakin) had faced these types of foes. He would be more prepared to face someone who was trained in Sith combat. As Anakin Skywalker, he had faced Master Yoda's former padawan Count Dooku on two occasions - ultimately defeating him. We cannot forget the frequent clashes with Count Dooku's trusted assassin Asajj Ventress, or his vicious assault on the Jedi temple where many Jedi were killed. Also, he went toe-to-toe with his own master Obi-Wan Kenobi, pushing his former master to the limit. In Episode IV, Vader (far more powerful with the dark side of the Force), finally gained revenge by defeating his former master (the very same Jedi master who destroyed Darth Maul himself).

Moreover, was it not Darth Vader (as Anakin) who was the chosen one? He was to bring balance to the Force and once he turned to Darth Vader, he did fulfill the prophecy. Although Maul was fueled by hatred, Vader's hatred and anger was the stronger of the two. Unlike Maul (whose moment of hesitation ultimately caused his defeat), Vader had very little patience and never hesitated to Force choke a military officer, threaten a Princess, torture someone, or nearly kill his own son.

Finally, if there is still any doubt that Vader is the stronger of the two - he destroyed the Emperor himself. Although he sacrificed himself to save Luke Skywalker, he still defeated the most powerful of the Sith. Vader's level of hated for the dark side was so strong, he would injure or sacrifice himself if necessary. These are traits I do not believe Darth Maul possessed. To prove this theory, read the comic book Star Wars Tales - Issue #9. A resurrected Darth Maul and Darth Vader had a fierce lightsaber duel. Maul started to gain the edge during the confrontation. With Vader on his knees, he stood behind Vader ready to destroy him. When Maul hesitated, he began to question Vader's level of hatred. He asked Vader what could he possibly hate more - Vader replied "myself." Vader then took his lightsaber, pierced it through his own armored body and Darth Maul's body with one strike - thus defeating Maul.

Now that is a Sith Lord!

Learn more about this author, Eugene G..
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

Darth Maul

I can't quite believe that I am going to weigh in on this issue, but since I was born in the 70's and I actually saw the "original" Star Wars in the theater, I'll give it a shot. Perhaps I am showing a bit too much of my "geek" side, but like any literary debate, one always wonders what would happen if characters from different times were to meet. While I can definitely see both sides of the issue, I would have to give the edge to Darth Maul. Granted, it is a bit like comparing baseball players from different eras. Can you really compare Babe Ruth to Barry Bonds? Lest we forget, Darth Maul and Darth Vader are also from different eras. Here are a few thoughts on their chance of winning a lightsaber duel to the death.

THE CASE FOR VADER

Granted, he is the "chosen one", but lets consider the fact that he was almost burned to a crisp by lava, needs a breathing apparatus in order to survive, and lives with a partially mechanical body. Not exactly a recipe for fluid motion. Plus, there aren't many Jedi around to keep him in game shape, so we have to consider who he faces. He dispatches Obi-Wan Kenobi in "A New Hope", though Obi-Wan basically gives up and he was old anyway. He essentially defeats Luke Skywalker in "The Empire Strikes Back", but Luke wasn't fully trained at that point. He then loses to Luke in "Return of the Jedi" and Luke technically wasn't a full Jedi until he faced Vader again. Not to mention the fact that the overall Force wasn't exactly flowing in Vader's time period.

THE CASE FOR MAUL

I give the nod to Maul because he is younger, hungrier and definitively quicker and more agile. Plus, he has that nasty double-lightsaber. He obviously has a pretty good handle of the Force (displayed in "The Phantom Menace") and he does take out an experienced Jedi Master in Qui-Gon Jinn. We also can't forget that he kept TWO Jedi at bay for quite a while before killing Qui-Gon and almost ending Obi-Wan as well. Maul was also around when the Force was flowing pretty strongly with all the Jedi around. While it would probably be a tough fight, I would give the edge to Maul.

OK, so this argument is trivial and meaningless. However, we do compare bits of history all the time and wonder what life would be like if certain figures or events were swapped, or at least put in the same era.

Learn more about this author, Todd Pheifer.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA