Join | Log in

Channel Button
Debate_icon

Politics, News & Issues   >

Government & Policies

Get a Widget for this title

Should elected officials be allowed to take trips on corporate jets?

Results so far:

Yes
26% 24 votes Total: 93 votes
No
74% 69 votes
Yes

We have a government that is of the people and for the people. It exists to defend the rights of every American, from the strongest and richest to the poorest and weakest. Naturally, it frightens us to think that corporations may be subverting our democracy in any way, but we can't forget why we fear it.

Our freedoms are very dear to us, and we should defend it, but let us not forget that our elected officials, while being politicians, are just as American as any of us are. They too deserve their freedoms, and those freedoms include the right to drive any vehicle that has not been deemed illegal. Private jets, while terrifying and corporate in nature, fall in place here.

Don't get me wrong I don't want my say in our government to go unheard simply because I don't have as much money as Microsoft. Luckily, that's not what would happen, and there's nothing to fear.

With the aid of political reforms, the press, and the internet, our modern political structure is more transparent than it has ever been in history. If a politician gets a ride in a private jet, those who want to know will know all about it. If his position on a related matter suddenly changed, the media would go crazy and an investigation would be launched immediately. Forgive me for being so blunt, but our elected officials aren't that stupid.

These people who serve our nation should not be denied the freedoms they help protect for us. Contributions are logged and made public. Trips and meetings with corporate figures no longer happen in secret, especially when there's a rather large jet involved. If we take away their freedom to travel as they wish, we're sacrificing one of the ideals of our country for a superficial, slight feeling of security.

Where does it end? If we're willing to take one freedom away that we might feel slightly more secure, what others can we destroy as to make us feel safer in our democracy than ever? Perhaps we should record every minute of the life of every American. It's sacrificing privacy, but it would also effectively catch criminals. We'd be more secure, that's for sure. The question is: is our security worth so much to us that we would sacrifice the freedoms that make us who we are?

A police state is a far cry from this one freedom, but everything starts somewhere. The first steps of Chancellor Adolf Hitler were hardly huge either, but we all know how that turned out. Not only is it morally wrong to deny our public servants their freedom, but it also sets a precedent that's inherently dangerous to our entire way of life.

A corporation with a jet will never control the Senate. It will never infringe on the rights of others, so there is no purpose in taking away that right. In the end, we, the people, are the ones elected officials need the approval of to continue in office.

Learn more about this author, David Dibattiste.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

I'm not sure when or how any of this type of "gratuity" ever began in our political system, but I, for one, believe that NONE of it has any place in our government.

I worked for nearly 40 years in Corporate America, and each year I was required to sign a "code of ethics" agreement, stating that I would not accept any gifts or gratuities from vendors, contractors, suppliers with whom I may do business on behalf of the company...due to possible "conflicts of interest". Of course, I obediently complied with this requirement, simply to keep my job!

I could never understand why our politicians are not under similar restrictions when it comes to defining "possible conflicts of interest". How can "Joe Public" compete with "Corporate America" in the gift-giving scenario? How can "Joe Public" even be HEARD in the same venue and level of respect afforded to Corporate America? Truth is, he cannot. Unfortunately, money speaks much louder than anything else in Government it seems. "Truth" doesn't seem to matter much; neither does "honor/honesty"; nor does "integrity"; nor "humility"; nor "fairness"; nor "equity", etc., etc.

As the Information Age progresses, it is becoming more and more clear that average citizens are continuously being swindled by those in power. Today, I heard that previously "secret" documents were released, after fifteen years of waiting from the time the request was made. Seems a long time to wait for "truth"...and the "truth" in those documents is certainly not the kind of information which fosters a "warm & fuzzy feeling" toward some of our government practices. See http://www.reuters.c om/article/topNews/i dUSN2636255220070626

So, back to the original question: Should elected officials be allowed to take trips on corporate jets?
I don't think so. You know the old cliche, right?

"Give 'em an inch, and they'll take a mile!"

We've seen it over and over and over again (indeed, seems every month another politician is called on the carpet for something 'unsavory').
I believe the only way to guarantee unbiased, objective political representation by elected officials is for them to be disallowed any gifts which would represent a potential conflict of interest.

Learn more about this author, Charlie H..
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA