Get a Widget for this title
RSS FeedShould cell phone use be banned while driving?
Results so far:
| Yes | 69% | 3491 votes | Total: 5088 votes | |
| No | 31% | 1597 votes |
Yes
Write now
Print
Invite a writer™
Add to FavoritesThey say that using a mobile phone will give you cancer. There have been studies upon studies funded by the most generous of governments to assure us that we will not get cancer from excessive phone use. Some of you are skeptical. I for one do not know what constitutes excessive use and how they determine the breakpoint between normal usage and excessive - should an alarm come up on your phone that says, "warning, your phone use is about to become excessive, do you wish to continue, as cancer may occur...". With the usual disclaimers of course that if cancer does in fact NOT occur then the phone people are not at fault for telling you that it might.
But I digress. It does not matter whether it will cause you brain damage because, using your phone in the car is a sure way to get yourself killed, or seriously maimed, or cause injury to some innocent pedestrian or other motorist, long before you get cancer. And isn't that a relief to know you won't get cancer from phone use? Feel better now?
I can tell from 50 feet away when a driver is on the phone. They slow down (obviously the blood rush to the brain is taking vital energy from the feet on the pedals) they begin to swerve in their lane (the inner ear, the balance one, is getting a bashing from the caller)and they swear at you when you toot the horn to tell them to get serious and get off the phone or off the road - a sure indication they are losing the thread of the conversation and so now it is your fault.
But it is not funny. Using a mobile in a car is downright dangerous. And that includes hands free. The problem is not your hands, you have two of those. And two ears. No, it is your brain. Unfortunately, you only have one. And its' real busy right now, doing all that complicated driving stuff. What on earth is so important that it cannot wait five minutes until you pull up at an appropriate stop and give the caller your full and UNDIVIDED attention. But the caller is at fault too. Who wants to be on the other end of a phone when the caller yells 'Watch out, I almost hit that pensioner daring to walk across the pedestrian crossing. can't she tell I am on the phone?"
Do everyone a favor, if you realize you are talking to someone on their mobile phone whilst they are driving, insist on hanging up and talking a bit later. Please. You may even stop them getting cancer.
Learn more about this author, Reckless Eric.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
No
Banning cell phones is impractical from a law enforcement standpoint, and expensive from a taxpayer standpoint.
Think about it.
On the surface, I'll admit that it looks like a good idea. I know people who have been hit by cell-phone users, and I know someone who has been on the phone when she initiated an accident.
But if you judge things by practicality, you'll see that banning cell-phone use while driving isn't close to genius. In fact, it's silly.
First, look at enforcement.
How many times have you seen a driver speed like mad down the right lanes of a highway without repercussions?
How many times have heard the story of people getting in a car crash, yet they didn't have their seatbelts on?
How many times have you had to honk and swerve as someone has almost run you off the road simply by not checking their blind spot?
The fact is, there's a lot of dangerous activity out on the roadways - not the least of which are drivers who simply don't know how to drive. Cell phones may be the least of your problems, and the least of the problems faced by the law enforcement officers who would actually have to enforce such a law.
In short: Let's enforce the laws we've got before adding new ones.
The second part of the argument is this: Is the cell phone going to be a PRIORITY for law enforcement officials? How important is it to nab someone on a cell phone? We have speeders and tailgaters to worry about - not to mention more dangerous criminals than traffic offenders.
Enforcing new laws takes additional law enforcement - or it takes time away from the law enforcement we've got already.
What would you rather see: Police make more drug busts in crime-ridden areas? Or police pulling over Mr. Slick because he's calling his office to let them know he'll be late for a meeting?
Here's my proposal:
Ticket those who swerve from their lanes - for whatever reason.
Ticket those who don't buckle up.
Ticket those who don't use their turn signals.
Ticket those who drive 85 mph in the right lane of a highway.
THEN worry about cell phones.
After all, some people can drive safely while talking on the phone. Some have done it for years.
Sure, some can't, too. Some are distracted. Some get into accidents.
But we're acting like cell phones are the first thing that's come up that's been a major distraction to drivers.
How about giant, booming speakers in the backs of cars and SUVs? They don't distract some drivers, do they?
How about eating a hamburger? Easy to do while driving, right?
How about applying makeup?
How about reading a map? Or, better yet, looking at a dashboard navigation system?
We need to worry about how a driver DRIVES. Not what he does while he's driving. Sure, it may be great to have a new law - but laws aren't enforced magically. It takes manpower. It takes money. And it takes the eyes of law enforcement officers OFF of more dangerous criminals.
Let's be practically. Forget this cell phone ban nonsense.
Learn more about this author, J.R. Anthony.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.
Difference of opinion? Debate now.
- Phone Technologies & Issues
- Will Apple's iPhone revolutionize mobile computing?
- Is texting a way to avoid people, or a way to connect even faster?
- Can use of cell phones cause brain tumors?
- Is text messaging causing the destruction of the English language?
- Should hands-free devices be mandatory for drivers?
