Join | Log in

Channel Button
Debate_icon

Education   >

Education (Other)

Get a Widget for this title

Should school vouchers be allowed for parochial schools?

Results so far:

Yes
61% 220 votes Total: 363 votes
No
39% 143 votes
Yes

Teachers, those who should be most adamant about improving the education system, lead the charge against vouchers (National Education Association, "Vouchers"). For the sake of religious freedom and failing inner-city schools, teachers and other citizens should reconsider the school voucher issue.

Vouchers provide inner-city schools the option to receive a better education than the public education system currently can provide them. Even with the growing school of choice programs, many inner-city students do not have the means to take advantage of the ability to go to a better neighboring school district if one exists. These students would benefit from vouchers because private schools would be able to open up in the inner-city to provide a valid alternative within their community to the public schools that are failing them.

Vouchers, despite being argued against as a violation of separation of church and state, are in actuality a liberating program that provides religious freedom. This is the reason publicly financed private schools are popular in the Netherlands (Ravitch, "The Right Thing"). In a private school, the government does not need to decide what religious holidays will be celebrated or ignored, whether the science classes will teach intelligent design along with evolution or not, or make any decision in regard to any other religious topic. Vouchers provide an actual separation of church and state in that the state would not have to make religious or anti-religious decisions in regards to a student's education while allowing parents to educate their children with the religious or secular convictions they hold.

The evidence shows that the United States is doing something wrong with their education policies; public funding of private education might be the improvement the educational system needs. "Of the thirty nations that are part of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, only seven do not permit any government funding of K-12 private schools; in addition to the United States, they include Greece, Ireland, Japan, Mexico, Portugal, and Turkey" (Ravitch, "The Right Thing"). Of these thirty nations in the Programme for International Student Assessment's (PISA), five of the bottom six in mathematics were from the group of seven that do not permit any government funding for private schools (PISA 53). Of the same thirty nations, the bottom four in science were from the same group of seven (PISA 22). The United States also did not fare too well on the survey: In science they finished 21st out of 30; in math they finished 25th out of 30 (PISA 53, 22). They were not graded in the reading results. All of this despite the United States spending the second most out of the thirty nations at $11,152 per student (Sharek).

Removing bureaucratic control is the most valid alternative to improve the city schools in monolithic bureaucratic systems like the New York City Department of Education and other large cities. Vouchers have only been implemented to any major degree in the United States in the inner-cities of Milwaukee and Cleveland, yet they show great potential (Ravitch, "The Right Thing"). Publicly funded private schools has been a success abroad. Seventy-six percent of all public spending in the Netherlands was given to private schools, yet they finished 3rd out of 30 in math and 6th out of 30 in science (Ravitch, "The Right Thing", PISA 53, 22). Belgium, who comes in second of the thirty nations by spending 58% of all their public money in private schools, finished 8th out of 30 in math and 16th out of 30 in science (Ravitch, "The Right Thing", PISA 53, 22).

The evidence shows that publicly funding private schools is not a recipe for disaster. In cities like New York City, where only 50% of the students graduate in four years, vouchers would be worth checking into since current attempts at change have not produced positive change. Cory Booker, the mayor of Newark, NJ, and neighbor to New York City, believes that his city could turn around education much faster than NYC if he is given mayoral control and the use of vouchers (Garland, "Booker Seeks Vouchers"). Vouchers allow a variety changes to be implemented at the same time, and these changes are focused on the classroom as well as administration. It is time for other cities to allow vouchers and give other failing students a choice, whether teachers agree or not.

Works Cited:

Garland, Sarah. "Booker Seeks Vouchers, Says He Could Best Bloomberg on Schools." New York Sun. 20 Feb. 2007. 3 Dec. 2007 .

National Education Association. "Vouchers." 9 Dec. 2007 .

Programme for International Student Assessment. "Executive Summary PISA 2006: Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World." 2006. 9 Dec 2007 .

Ravitch, Diane. "The Right Thing: Why Liberals Should Be Pro-Choice." The New Republic. 8 Oct. 2001. 3 Dec. 2007 .

Sharek, Dylan. "U.S. Drops in International Education Rankings." Mosaic. 20 Oct. 2005. 9 Dec. 2007
.

Learn more about this author, pilgrimboy.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

All parents have the right to send their children to a parochial school of their choice. However, that is a choice based on economic conditions and commitment to the faith. To work an extra job to pay the tuition is a viable way to exercise the choice, to expect the other taxpayers to pay for the choice is not acceptable.

What is the idea of the proposed school vouchers? Essentially a parent who wishes to send a child to a parochial school would receive money from the government to pay for that school. This would be in the form of a voucher, so that the money transfer is directly from the government and does not pass through the hands of the parent. However, essentially the government is handing a check to the parent to use.

The children in any community have a wide set of needs and requirements. Some have limited English language skills; others have learning disabilities and other special needs. Our society designed the public school systems to ensure that all children in the community have access to a basic education. Private and parochial school systems have no such requirements. They are designed to serve the needs of their masters (whether the church or a private company) and not the needs of the community.

Local homeowners pay property taxes to provide the bulk of the funding that goes into the school systems. They pay these taxes with the desire that the money is used to ensure that all children receive an education. They do not pay the taxes so that a particular child has access to a school of his choice.

The local homeowner wants his money used responsibly. The school boards are accountable to the community. They are representatives of the community charged with spending the money according to the needs of all the children in that community. The parochial school boards have no accountability to the community and do not need to answer to the community.

Once the homeowners money starts flowing out of the school system, one of two things will happen: the school systems will decline or the tax rates of the home owners will decline. Schools are capital-intensive institutions. If the number of students in the schools decline, the capital requirements of buildings and salaries do not decline proportionately. Ten percent fewer students do not equate to ten percent fewer music teachers or math teachers. Therefore, school services will need to be cut or tax rates will need to be raised.

Lastly, parochial schools have a religious agenda. Members of the community that are paying the taxes may or may not agree with the religious agenda. Paying taxpayer monies to religious institutions goes against the constitutional separation of church and state. The purpose is immaterial. Taxpayers should not be paying for services offered by a religious organization.

In summary, to take the homeowners monies and transfer them to private entities does not meet the objective of building a community that is committed to the education of all its children. It does allow a particular parent to exercise a choice. However, even without school vouchers, the parent still has that choice. They simply have to work to pay for the choice and not expect a hand out from the government.

Learn more about this author, Sandeep Johar.
Contact this writer Click here to send this author comments or questions.

What is Helium? | Buy Web Content | Contact Us | Privacy | User agreement | DMCA | User Tools | Help | Community | Helium’s Official Blog | Link to Helium

Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA