Search Helium

Home > Pets & Animals > Dogs > Dogs (Other)

Should restaurants allow dogs in with their owners?

Results so far:

Yes
34% 812 votes Total: 2385 votes
No
66% 1573 votes

Yes

by Kathy Goodin-Mitchell

Created on: September 28, 2007

Restaurants in the US are banned from allowing dogs into their space due to state and local health restrictions. However, if you look at restaurants in Europe you find there are not as many restrictions. In addition, if you look at the whole culture in Europe you will see a total difference in how they view eating out, pets, cleanliness and where value is placed.

While Americans have had a love affair with pets in the last decade, our fellow Europeans have settled into their pet relationships in a more reasonable and realistic manner. Europeans see pets as companions and family members, hence their difference in treatment of animals. It is expensive to own a pet in Europe so many are well treated. In America it is much less expensive to purchase, license, treat and house a pet which leads us to not think of our pets as valued property. As with anything, if it is cheap, it is not valued.

All this said, I see no reason why pets, specifically dogs can not join owners in restaurants. Americans could learn from our European cousins in how to incorporate our pets into our everyday society. Dogs are not dirty, or poisonous to our food and do not pose health hazards in restaurants. Think of how many people have pets in their homes all over the world. Do any of us fall victim to disease because our pet lays at our feet when we are cooking or under the table while we eat? NO! In Europe pets come with you on walks, into stores and most any place a person can be seen. Even old King Charles put into law that the Cavalier King Charles Spaniel is allowed anywhere in all of England.

It is also my belief that if restaurants practiced good cleaning protocol then cleaning standards would not be an issue in the first place in the US. Health standards are set out of necessity since many restaurants do not place cleanliness as a priority. Bringing a pet into the space only then adds to the larger issue of failed cleanliness. The pet alone can not cause enough issue to make a restaurant dirty or to fail to meet legal standards. If restaurants met standards first then pets would not be an issue.

So, there, I have said it all. I blame the fact we can not take our pets into restaurants on the restaurant owners and our culture. If restaurant owners would clean up their act, then we would have a chance to change the standards in the US. If pet owners would treat animals as valued property, then pets would not be seen as dirty throw-a-ways. In other words, if we all worked together we could make the changes needed so pets could enjoy more time with humans everywhere. I am all for the change.

Learn more about this author, Kathy Goodin-Mitchell.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

by Jimmy Flatbush

Created on: August 02, 2010   Last Updated: September 25, 2010

The typical greeting at a restaurant goes something like this:

“Good evening! Would you like a table for two?”

Now, we hear this follow up question far too often in an increasing number of restaurants:

“…and will your dog like extra treats this evening?”

Love for our canine companions has reached ridiculous heights, as municipalities across the United States enact ordinances allowing dogs into full and limited service restaurants. My city passed a similar ordinance two years ago, as the Mayor placated an ardent faction of dog lovers who wanted their canine companions to sit near them while they dined at outside venues such as patios and sidewalk cafes. Of course, it was an election year and the Mayor-a proud dog owner-did not disappoint his canine loving voter base.

Even though most of the ordinances restrict canines to outside dining areas, allowing dogs to saunter around among other canines and humans is an idea politicians should permanently store in the file “Ideas we thought were good that turned out to be disasters.: The potential for food-borne illnesses, and the threat to personal safety, are two compelling arguments for keeping dogs away from restaurants.

Restaurants are potential incubators for a number of debilitating food-borne illnesses. Recent national news stories concerning E Coli and Salmonella out breaks attest to the risks restaurant operators face when handling food items. Restaurant operators also deal with employee hygienic practices and food production systems that can lead to Hepatitis A and C. Moreover, most people (an estimated seventy percent) do not wash their hands after using the restroom. The geniuses who run local governments now want to add canines into this combustible food safety equation.

You do not have to be “House” to understand that canines present sanitation issues. The most significant issue is the fecal matter that accumulates under restaurant tables, and the urine dogs spray in order to mark their territory. Fecal matter contains bacteria that may precipitate life threatening diseases. The diseases are contracted either through contact with flies/mosquitoes or by cross contamination into the food supply. Flies and mosquitoes are one of the more frequently cited health code violations in restaurants. If canines are allowed in restaurants, these disease carrying menaces do not have to travel far in order to unload their bacteria.

The number of people who touch a dog before handling food exacerbates health concerns. Take the time to observe people at a restaurant that allow dogs. Do these people wash their hands after touching a dog? A predominant number of people do not was their hands after touching a dog. Instead, they grab a sandwich or lift a fork up to their mouths. Food safety experts recommend thoroughly washing our hands after we touch our hair. Yet, people rarely wash their hands after petting Fido.

Food safety concerns are reason enough to ban canines from restaurants. However, personal safety offers a cogent second argument for leaving canines at home during a nice dinner or a quick bite to eat. Watch “Animal Planet” when they feature a story about canines or a particular dog breed. Invariably, the episode will at least briefly describe the fierce territorial battles waged among canines. Allowing dogs into a dining area will intensify any territorial issues because of the food scraps dropped on the ground. Canines will not only fight over land, they will also battle for the pork chop bone dropped by an unwitting diner. Dog fights can injure people, especially children who heighten aggressive canine behavior by making sudden, unexpected moves. Do you believe allowing dogs into a restaurant is worth the risk of personal injury, regardless of how small you perceive the risk? Why would a restaurant operator want this potential liability added to his or her already onerous liability list?

Dog owners like to brag about how their dog is part of the family. Sometimes, they take canine adulation too far, such as labeling Christmas gifts with their dog’s name. Allowing dogs into restaurants is the latest attempt to level the plane between man and canine. The plane should not level, but split into two planes that occasionally intersect. One such place where the two planes should never intersect is at a restaurant, except in the cases when dogs assist people with their movement.


Learn more about this author, Jimmy Flatbush.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA