Search Helium

Home > Politics, News & Issues > Environmental Issues > Environmental Awareness

Should grass lawns be banned in water-restricted areas?

Results so far:

Yes
43% 135 votes Total: 316 votes
No
57% 181 votes

Yes

by John Borden

Created on: June 23, 2007

No matter how many times the experts talk about water scarcity and conservation, no matter how hard they try to stress the importance of water as what may very well be one of the most valuable resources on this planet, some people just don't seem to get the idea that water needs to be treated with reverence rather than treated as, well, the stuff that seems to always come out of the faucet or the gardening hose whenever you want it to.

Water was at one time a pretty big deal, civilization always seemed to start where the water was, earlier wars were fought over the resource, gods were given the task of controlling water and how it's distributed among the people, we treated it with the reverence it so deserved.

Many years have passed since those first people settled around the river and formed the foundation of what would become human civilization. Even though it's been such a long time we still have the same amount of water as we did back then, it never really seems to go away, yet for some odd reason all the respect that it had received in the past seemed to...vanish in the industrialized regions of the world.

So why is it treated the way it is now? The reason could probably be blamed on something early man never seemed to get the hang of, heavy machinery. With the birth of industrialization came machines that made a lot of tasks far easier than the were before when they required human or animal power, and they also allowed us to do a lot of things we were unable to accomplish in the past. Making sure a city had adequate plumbing and that a crop got the proper amount of water through irrigation was much easier than before, and now we could drill to depths previously too difficult through human means, which gave us access to underground aquifers rich in water. Still the same amount of water since the first city was formed, but now we have far greater access to it.

Unfortunately, things have changed. Because of the fact that the population has essentially exploded in size comes greater demand for water and the resources that require water such as...pretty much everything if you think hard enough. Combine this with the fact that a great deal of water comes from those aquifers mentioned previously. Some aquifers can actually replenish their water reserves through various means, though the amount we take out often exceeds the amount that goes back in. Then there are the other aquifers that have no means of replenishing their reserves, when they run out they're out for good, the worst part is these "Fossil Aquifers" are often the larger of the two types. Now add to the two the issue of many bodies of water around the world shrinking in size, a good example of this phenomenon is Lake Chad which actually shrank from an area of 26,000 km in the 1960s to the present area of around 1,500 km.

Of course, water never really goes away, right? So I guess all this water is going somewhere. The problem is, it could be going anywhere, the water you used on your plants could very well be in the form of a cloud 500 or more miles away from where you live. Water is so easy to access because it's where we want it to be, in the form of bodies of water such as lakes and those wonderful little underground aquifers, rain is pretty swell but it's a little harder to harvest water from rain than it is to harvest water from a lake or a river, the oceans are filled with water but the problem is they're all made up of icky sea water which has to be put through this energy intensive process of removing the salt before it can be considered drinkable, glaciers and icebergs have plenty of fresh water but it's a bit of a hassle to melt them down so that you can drink them in your glass. Water is moving from being concentrated and easy to get state to a spread out and hard to find one.

Now that I've given that little lecture on the importance of water, maybe we should evaluate what matters most when it comes to the many uses of water, in the form of a list with the most important stuff on top and the least important on bottom, decide what matters most to you and what you can ease up on so as to conserve water.

- Water for drinking is important, can only last 3 days without it
- Food is pretty good, maybe we should save some water for growing food for you, me, how 'bout everybody?
- I like keeping clean, maybe we should keep it around for showering
- Industrial processes are pretty important, there are some pretty nifty things around you and me that require water
- Gardening is pretty fun, I guess we could put water down here
- Water is a beautiful thing, we could always put it in a fountain.

Think about it, there are so many more important things out there than gardening that require water, and here you are wasting it on keeping the grass green of all things! So come on, ease up on the water, how 'bout digging up some of that grass and setting up a nice little cactus garden instead, or maybe using some of that water to grow some of your very own tasty vegetables, but please don't continue to waste it on grass and please don't gripe to your city about unfair restrictions on the use of water and how ugly your lawn looks because of it.

After all, our improper use of water could come back to bite us in the but later on whenever we discover the aquifers are looking dry.

Learn more about this author, John Borden.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.

No

by Patrick D

Created on: May 28, 2007

A ban on something like lawns for the purpose of curbing water use would be more of a headache than it's worth. If municipalities ban lawns then they have to police it, and impose fines when people don't comply, and so on. There are many, much better ways that a municipality can encourage a reduction of water use by being more creative.

Municipalit ies can try for lawn free neighborhoods through volunteer programs and offer rewards or tax cut to those who do. Or they can figure what the average household uses for the basics like washing, cooking, and eating, and impose a tax on the quantity that they use over and above that, and make the heavy users of water pay the high cost of cleaning water to drinking standards, and teach them the hard way to use water more wisely.

Other things municipalities can do are to help people install gray water recovery systems in their homes and mandate all new homes come with these systems already in them. The technology exists and is out there, these systems collect the water you use in your showers and sinks, filters it and reuses that water to flush toilets and for outdoor irrigation. This type of system benefits the municipality in several ways, it reduces fresh water use and it reduces the amount of water that needs to be treated at a wastewater treatment plant. The advantage here to the homeowner is that they can do what they want with that water; it can be used to water a lawn, garden or vegetable patch, and encourages people to find alternatives to harsh chemicals used for cleaning, as they know that this water will be reused on their property.

Short of this thought people can and should do their own part to reduce the amount of water that is used to water their lawn and property. People can convert part or all of their lawn to a garden that has local native plants that are drought tolerant, and tolerant to local conditions. Use mulches to help maintain soil moisture. People can also just stop watering the parts of their lawn that don't get used. People can water more efficiently, use drip irrigation instead of aerial irrigation, and water during the cooler periods of the day (early morning or late evening) to reduce water evaporation.

People need to realize that water IS a limited resource and costs a lot of money to treat it to the point where people can drink it. Other that the suggestions listed above there are still plenty of other things a municipality can do before having to resort to a ban of lawns. The bottom line is an outright ban would just cause more headaches and cost more money (enforcing and legal "play") than it's worth.

Learn more about this author, Patrick D.
Click here to send this author comments or questions.


CONNECT WITH US

Read
our blog
Helum for writers

Write and get published
Share with other writers
Polish your freelancing skills

Join our active writing community
Helium Content Source for Publishers

Quality articles from proven freelancers
Exclusive rights, fast turnaround
Brand engagement, business blogging -- our writers do it all

Get custom content today!

INFORMATION


Helium, Inc.
200 Brickstone Square Andover, MA 01810 USA